FDA Names Tracy Beth Høeg as Acting CDER Director After Richard Pazdur Announces Retirement 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Pause on New Wind-Energy Permits 
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track 
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected 
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation 
U.S. Backs Bayer in Supreme Court Battle Over Roundup Cancer Lawsuits 
Elliott Management Takes $1 Billion Stake in Lululemon, Pushes for Leadership Change 
Blackstone Leads $400 Million Funding Round in Cyera at $9 Billion Valuation 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
Pfizer Secures $10 Billion Deal for Obesity Drug Developer Metsera, Outbids Novo Nordisk 
FedEx Beats Q2 Earnings Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook Despite Stock Dip 
Harris Associates Open to Revised Paramount Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 
Cogent Biosciences Soars 120% on Breakthrough Phase 3 Results for Bezuclastinib in GIST Treatment 
Oracle Stock Surges After Hours on TikTok Deal Optimism and OpenAI Fundraising Buzz 
On Monday, a U.S. appeals court ruled in favor of 3M, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co, and other manufacturers of "forever chemicals." The court rejected a lower court's ruling, allowing approximately 11.8 million Ohio residents to sue the companies.
Reuters noted that the ruling relieves considerable legal pressure placed on the chemical manufacturers to settle the plaintiffs' claims.
Court Ruling Questions Class Action Suit's Validity
According to Yahoo, Lead plaintiff Kevin Hardwick's complaint against the manufacturers faced scrutiny from the court. The appeals court found his complaint to be overly broad and lacking evidence that the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) detected in his body could be directly attributed to the defendants.
The court emphasized that the complaint targeted the collective actions of the companies rather than individual responsibility. Notably, the case involved just 10 out of thousands of companies involved in PFAS manufacturing.
The lower court's approval of the class action suit has been vacated, and the court instructed the dismissal of Hardwick's lawsuit. The lawsuit aimed to hold the companies accountable for the health impacts of PFAS exposure and sought to establish a fund to monitor Ohio residents.
Additionally, Hardwick's request for the companies to fund studies on the health effects of PFAS was denied. These forever chemicals, commonly found in consumer products, have been linked to cancer and other diseases.
Robert Bilott, attorney for Hardwick, expressed disappointment with the court's decision. He stated that it contradicts what is known about the history of PFAS manufacturing in the United States. Bilott's legal team is currently evaluating whether to appeal the ruling further.
The Persistence and Prevalence of Forever Chemicals
PFAS substances earned the nickname "forever chemicals" due to their resistance to breaking down in nature or in the human body. The growing number of lawsuits filed against 3M, DuPont, and other manufacturers in recent years reflect concerns over alleged PFAS contamination.
In June, 3M agreed to pay $10.3 billion to settle hundreds of claims regarding public drinking water pollution caused by PFAS. Furthermore, Chemours Co, DuPont de Nemours Inc, and Corteva reached a similar settlement worth $1.19 billion with U.S. water providers.
Photo: 3M News Center
