FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision 
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out 
Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm 
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record 
Coupang has been trending in South Korea after a customer uploaded photos of the cooking oil she purchased at the e-commerce store. As her story spread, the largest online retailer in the country has been criticized for allegedly selling a product that had already expired more than 16 years ago.
The customer uploaded photos of the cooking oil with the expiration date of 2005, and her post was quickly shared online. Now, Coupang is also being accused of being negligent with its lax inspection of returned products.
As per The Korea Times, the customer posted close-up photos of the label of a refined soybean cooking oil. The expiry date shows June 9, 2005, which is 16 years, and four months expired in October. The customer further said that Coupang put a note on the cooking oil, explaining that only the container was damaged, but the product insider is still good to use.
"I ordered two bottles of cooking oil on Coupang and one of them had expired in 2005," the buyer claimed. "If I had not checked and used it to cook my meal, something horrible could have happened."
In response to the claim and circulating photos, Coupang said it has already launched an internal investigation to determine what happened and clarify the allegations. While there are some who are not entirely blaming the company, more people think that it was Coupang's fault.
One concerned commenter said that something bad could have happened if the customer had not checked the expiration date. He/She added that Coupang should be very careful when checking the returned products so there will be no mix-ups.
"The controversial cooking oil had been sent off from our warehouse that opened in 2018," a company official said in response. "There is no chance that an item that expired in 2005 would have been stocked at our fulfillment center."
Meanwhile, some people sided with Coupang and raised suspicion that the customer may have tried to take advantage of the online retailer's return policy by deliberately returning an expired cooking oil after getting a new bottle as a replacement. Another one pointed out that the allegation does not make sense because Coupang was launched in 2010, so it could not have distributed a cooking oil that was made five years before the store opened.
