Disability rights organizations and Social Security recipients have filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration and billionaire Elon Musk, accusing them of illegally slashing the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) workforce and shutting down critical offices. Filed in Washington, D.C., the lawsuit claims that the mass layoffs and closures violate constitutional rights and federal disability laws.
Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency is at the center of the controversy, having led a sweeping campaign to reduce federal employment and cut costs. Around 7,000 SSA employees were reportedly fired, and several offices that handled civil rights complaints and beneficiary services were closed.
Plaintiffs argue these actions disproportionately harm people with disabilities, infringing on their rights under the U.S. Constitution and the Rehabilitation Act. They allege the cuts are “arbitrary and capricious” and obstruct access to vital services for elderly and disabled Americans. The SSA currently serves 73 million people, providing monthly benefits that are essential for financial survival.
The lawsuit seeks to block further office closures, prevent the termination of more SSA staff, and halt rules requiring some beneficiaries to verify their identity in person—a move critics say imposes undue burdens on vulnerable populations.
Last week, the SSA reversed a plan to cut phone services and scrapped the in-person identity rule after public backlash. However, disability advocates say more must be done to restore critical services and ensure fair treatment for all beneficiaries.
The White House and SSA have not commented on the lawsuit.
This legal battle highlights growing concerns over the privatization and downsizing of essential federal agencies, particularly those serving the most vulnerable. The case could set a major precedent for protecting the rights of disabled Americans amid sweeping government reforms.


Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
U.S. Condemns South Africa’s Expulsion of Israeli Diplomat Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 



