A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


In a rebuke to Trump, the Supreme Court rules that birthright citizenship is the law of the land
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property
Kitron Q2 Revenue Beats Estimates as Defense Demand Lifts Growth
Elon Musk Says Anthropic Leads AI Race as Claude Models Challenge OpenAI
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States
DOJ Grand Jury Investigates UAW President Shawn Fain Ahead of Union Election
RFK Jr. Orders Extended Hantavirus Quarantine for Cruise Passenger
Ann Widdecombe Murder: Police Arrest Second Suspect, Rule Out Terrorism Motive
Russia Launches Missile and Drone Attacks on Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Kharkiv
Minnesota Wildfires Spread as Governor Tim Walz Deploys National Guard
Trinidad Businessman Dominic Hadeed Appeals Detention Over Alleged Assassination Plot
Sara Duterte Impeachment Trial Opens, Putting 2028 Philippine Election in Focus
Medicare to Cover GLP-1 Weight-Loss and Diabetes Drugs Starting July 1
Trump Administration Hands Over Key Evidence in Minnesota Immigration Shooting Investigations
Brazil Court Bars Flavio Bolsonaro From Visiting Jair Bolsonaro Ahead of Election
Iran Says It Closes Strait of Hormuz After Warning Shot at Vessel
Venezuela Appoints Felix Plasencia to Lead Foreign Relations and Trade 



