California Woman Arrested Over Alleged Spying on Taiwan President’s Son 
California AG Subpoenas OpenAI Over AI Cybersecurity Incidents 
Trump Administration Prepares Sanctions Against Entire ICC 
JD Vance Says Iran Must Cut Nuclear Enrichment to End War 
Judge Blocks Trump Election Conditions on Counterterrorism Grants 
Lincoln University Students Sue Missouri Over Decades of Underfunding 
Colombia Extradites FARC Dissident Leader ‘Spider’ to US 
Trump Weighs FBI Probe Into Nolan Wells’ Death 
Florida Seeks Tougher Meta Rules to Protect Young Users 
Fairshake Backs 32 Pro-Crypto House Candidates 
CFTC Moves to Set New Crypto Rules After CLARITY Act Failure 
DaVoice Sues Perplexity AI Over Trade Secrets 
Mexico Bars Dual Citizens From Presidential Races Starting in 2028 
OpenAI, Anthropic Back Mandatory AI Breach Reporting in Australia 
Tencent Shares Fall as $5 Billion AI Bond Sale Weighed 
Russia Targets Danish Ukraine Suppliers in Sabotage Campaign 
Intel Reaffirms Role in Elon Musk’s Terafab Chip Project 
Add as a preferred source on Google
A federal judge has temporarily blocked Virginia from enforcing a new social media law designed to protect children from online addiction, ruling that it likely violates First Amendment rights. The decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over age verification laws and youth access to social media platforms.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles in Alexandria issued a preliminary injunction against Senate Bill 854, a law signed by former Governor Glenn Youngkin in May 2025 that took effect on January 1, 2026. The legislation required social media companies to verify users’ ages and restricted minors under 16 to just one hour of daily use.
The lawsuit was filed by NetChoice, a technology trade association representing major platforms including Google, Meta, Netflix, Reddit, and Elon Musk’s X. The group argued that the Virginia social media law infringed on free speech rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.
In her ruling, Judge Giles stated that while Virginia has a compelling interest in addressing the youth mental health crisis and the addictive features of social media, the law was both overly broad and inconsistent. She noted that the measure required age verification for all users, including adults, making it overinclusive. At the same time, it excluded certain interactive gaming platforms that may also have addictive features, rendering it underinclusive.
The judge further pointed out that the law restricted minors from viewing more than an hour of content on topics such as science, history, or religious programming on social media platforms, even though similar content remained accessible on streaming services.
Virginia officials said they remain committed to enforcing laws that help parents protect children from online harms. Meanwhile, NetChoice welcomed the decision, emphasizing that the government cannot limit access to lawful speech, even with good intentions.
