A coalition of unions, employers, and religious groups has filed a lawsuit in federal court in San Francisco to block President Donald Trump’s order imposing a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas. The case marks the first legal challenge to Trump’s proclamation, issued two weeks ago, which aimed to further restrict immigration by raising costs for employers seeking to hire skilled foreign workers.
The plaintiffs include the United Auto Workers, the American Association of University Professors, a nurse recruitment agency, and several religious organizations. They argue that Trump exceeded his authority, since only Congress has the power to impose fees or taxes. According to the lawsuit, the administration’s move effectively transformed the H-1B program into a “pay-to-play” system that threatens fairness, innovation, and U.S. competitiveness.
The White House defended the measure, with spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stating it was a lawful effort to discourage abuse of the visa system and protect American wages. Trump claimed the program was undermining national security and discouraging U.S. citizens from pursuing careers in science and technology, pointing to what he described as the “large-scale replacement of American workers.”
Currently, employers sponsoring H-1B workers typically pay between $2,000 and $5,000 in fees. The new rule would apply only to new applicants after September 21 and exempt existing visa holders. Plaintiffs argue that agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department, bypassed necessary rulemaking procedures when implementing the policy.
The H-1B program provides 65,000 visas annually, plus an additional 20,000 for workers with advanced degrees. These visas are crucial for U.S. technology companies, which rely heavily on foreign talent. India accounts for 71% of approved visas, followed by China at 11.7%, according to government data. Critics argue the visas depress wages, while businesses emphasize they fill critical skill shortages in the American workforce.


US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days
US Judge Seeks Explanation for DOJ’s Decision to Drop Gautam Adani Bribery Case
DOE Declares Power Grid Emergency as Extreme Heat Strains PJM Electricity Supply
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case
Trump Administration Bars U.S. Travelers From Congo Flights Amid Ebola Outbreak
Wolfspeed Sues Navitas Over GaN and SiC Patent Infringement
Reuters/Ipsos Poll: Most Americans Expect U.S.-Iran War to Be Prolonged
EU Ministers Split as Support Grows for Ban on Trade With Israeli West Bank Settlements
HHS Watchdog Reports $5.56 Billion in Healthcare Fraud Recoveries as Enforcement Actions Decline
Trump Administration Sues Maryland Over Alleged Sanctuary Immigration Policies
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Journalists Over Air Force One Leak Report
Trump Recommends Darline Graham for Interim South Carolina Senate Seat
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation
Western Allies Push for More Air Defenses for Ukraine at Paris Summit
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
DHS Investigates Cyber Breach in Homeland Security Information-Sharing Network 



