Trump Administration Sues Maryland Over Alleged Sanctuary Immigration Policies 
Asia Stocks Slip as Iran-Hormuz Tensions Lift Oil Prices, Dollar and Bond Yields 
Gold Price Holds Near $4,000 as Middle East Tensions and Fed Rate Hike Bets Grow 
Sara Duterte Impeachment Trial Opens, Putting 2028 Philippine Election in Focus 
In a rebuke to Trump, the Supreme Court rules that birthright citizenship is the law of the land 
Mastercard Explores Sale of Majority Stake in UK Payments Firm Vocalink: Report 
SK Hynix Shares Drop After Strong Nasdaq Debut Despite $26 Billion ADR Listing 
DBS Targets S$1 Trillion Wealth AUM by 2030 Amid Asia Wealth Boom 
Asian Currencies Weaken as Stronger Dollar Weighs, Yen Supported by GPIF Repatriation Hopes 
Texas Man Charged After Fatal Tesla Full Self-Driving Crash in Katy 
Yaskawa Electric Shares Slide as Weak Profit Overshadows Strong AI Demand 
Apple Sues OpenAI, Former Employees Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft 
Arm Stock Falls After HSBC Downgrade, Citing Limited Near-Term AI Upside 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
