Silver Prices Plunge in Asian Trade as Dollar Strength Triggers Fresh Precious Metals Sell-Off 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Singapore Budget 2026 Set for Fiscal Prudence as Growth Remains Resilient 
Gold and Silver Prices Rebound After Volatile Week Triggered by Fed Nomination 
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business 
Thailand Inflation Remains Negative for 10th Straight Month in January 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
Japanese Pharmaceutical Stocks Slide as TrumpRx.gov Launch Sparks Market Concerns 
Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell 
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law 
Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
