A U.S. appeals court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue enforcing its ban on transgender individuals seeking to enlist in the military while ongoing legal challenges proceed. However, the court also blocked the government from removing currently serving transgender military personnel, marking a significant development in the debate over transgender rights in the armed forces.
In a 2-1 decision issued Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined that the Pentagon can maintain restrictions on new transgender recruits due to its broad authority to establish military enlistment standards. At the same time, the court concluded that forcing active transgender service members out of the military would cause far greater harm than delaying entry for prospective recruits.
Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins, appointed by former President Barack Obama, wrote that ending an established military career would impose a more severe hardship than postponing the start of one. The ruling partially supports an earlier federal court decision that had blocked the entire policy from taking effect.
The case stems from a January 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump, which argued that adopting a transgender identity conflicts with military values and readiness. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later implemented the order, prompting legal action from transgender service members and advocacy organizations.
LGBTQ rights group GLAD Law, representing the plaintiffs, welcomed the decision. Attorney Jennifer Levi stated that the ruling confirms there is no legitimate justification for dismissing transgender troops who have consistently met military standards and demonstrated their commitment to service.
Judge Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, dissented, arguing that courts lack the expertise and authority to determine military personnel policies.
The decision follows a May 2025 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allowed the transgender military policy to take effect in a separate case. While the Supreme Court did not provide detailed reasoning, the D.C. Circuit noted that the ruling may have been based on procedural considerations rather than the policy’s legality.
The dispute is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to roll back federal recognition and accommodations for transgender individuals. The U.S. military currently has approximately 1.3 million active-duty personnel, with estimates placing the number of transgender service members in the thousands.


Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case
Russia Launches Missile and Drone Attacks on Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Kharkiv
Western Allies Push for More Air Defenses for Ukraine at Paris Summit
South Korea Alleges Google Abused Android App Store Dominance, Eyes Major Fine
HHS Watchdog Reports $5.56 Billion in Healthcare Fraud Recoveries as Enforcement Actions Decline
DOJ Orders Crackdown on Birth Tourism After Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation
Iran's Supreme Leader Vows Revenge as Trump Threatens Massive U.S. Military Response
Trump Administration to Launch Voluntary AI Standards for Frontier Models
Brazil to Phase Out Gasoline Subsidy First as Diesel Support Stays Longer
Amy Coney Barrett Faces Conservative Backlash After Key Supreme Court Rulings Against Trump
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Fraud Charges Against Gautam Adani in U.S. Court
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Journalists Over Air Force One Leak Report
Iran Says It Closes Strait of Hormuz After Warning Shot at Vessel 



