A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


US DOT Ends Airline Privacy Review Without Enforcement
Russia Targets Danish Ukraine Suppliers in Sabotage Campaign
UK Warned Over Growing Reliance on US Cloud Providers
UK Sanctions Crypto Exchanges Linked to Russia
Trump Orders Firing Squad Execution for Fort Hood Gunman
Crypto Rallies as CLARITY Act Failure Opens Door to Faster SEC Rules
Saudi Arabia Probes Flydubai Cockpit Attack
Berlin Coalition Talks Advance After Left Party Antisemitism Deal
France to Release 10 Million Barrels of Diesel to Ease Fuel Prices
Saudi Airport Attacks Kill Three as Yemen Fighting Escalates
CNN, Politico and MS NOW Seek Court Order Blocking Trump White House Ban
DaVoice Sues Perplexity AI Over Trade Secrets
Trump Weighs FBI Probe Into Nolan Wells’ Death
US Government Moves $1 Billion in Bitcoin Amid Sale Speculation
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Sue Trump Over White House Media Ban 



