A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Ukraine, Europe Launch Freyja Missile Shield to Strengthen Air Defense Against Russia
Supreme Court Backs Lisa Cook, Defends Federal Reserve Independence Against Trump Firing Attempt
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices
Israeli Strikes Kill Six in Gaza as Ceasefire Talks Continue in Cairo
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites
France Keeps Top Health Alert as Officials Brace for Another Heatwave
Venezuela Earthquake Health Risks Rise as Disease Monitoring Intensifies
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation
DOJ Grand Jury Investigates UAW President Shawn Fain Ahead of Union Election
DOE Declares Power Grid Emergency as Extreme Heat Strains PJM Electricity Supply
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case
Trump Suspends Some Morocco Fertilizer Tariffs to Ease U.S. Supply Shortage
Ann Widdecombe Murder: Police Arrest Second Suspect, Rule Out Terrorism Motive
Iranian Missile Strike on UAE Oil Tankers Kills Indian Crew Member in Strait of Hormuz
EU Weighs New Trade Restrictions on Israeli West Bank Settlements
EU to Propose New Rules Limiting Children's Access to Social Media 



