Arbitrum finished the Oct. 28-Nov. 4 period with the strongest positive bridge balance among tracked networks, while Hyperliquid had the deepest deficit; Artemis data show a $385.68 million gap between them.
Arbitrum’s incoming bridge transfers topped outflows by $194.52 million. Hyperliquid moved the other way, with $191.16 million more leaving than arriving. A network’s net flow is its incoming bridge value minus what leaves, so the gap compares each chain’s balance rather than its total activity.
Arbitrum saw $1.13 billion arrive through bridges and $934.94 million depart. Hyperliquid’s inbound total reached $973.43 million, but $1.16 billion went out. The two networks therefore ranked first in opposite directions even though both had substantial activity on each side.
Ethereum also had more value exit than enter: its $360.85 million in outflows exceeded $261.47 million in inflows, leaving a $99.38 million net decline. The reported inflow totals for Polygon and Base were $101.63 million and $82.01 million, while their outflows came to $88.49 million and $24.15 million, respectively.
Among networks with net gains other than Arbitrum, Base led at $57.87 million. Net gains were $15.93 million for Solana, $13.76 million for Optimism and $13.14 million for Polygon. Beyond Ethereum, the largest negative balances were $16.59 million for BSC, $2.12 million for Starknet and $1 million for Unichain.
The broader gross-transfer figures show activity across other networks as well. Solana took in $38.30 million and sent $22.38 million out, while Optimism’s inflow of $30.78 million compared with $17.02 million in outflows. Robinhood Chain recorded $15.45 million in inflows and $11.51 million in outflows.
Arbitrum and Hyperliquid also occupied opposite ends of the net-flow ranking in Oct. 14-21, according to an earlier EconoTimes report on bridge activity. Arbitrum’s gain then was $148.87 million; Hyperliquid’s net outflow was $192.01 million.
