Nike is facing a proposed class action lawsuit after consumers accused the global sportswear giant of failing to return tariff-related costs that were allegedly passed on through higher product prices. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Portland, Oregon, claims Nike could receive substantial tariff refunds from the U.S. government while consumers who paid inflated prices receive nothing in return.
According to the complaint, Nike increased prices on several products after former President Donald Trump imposed broad import tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The company reportedly raised footwear prices by $5 to $10 and apparel prices by $2 to $10 to offset the financial impact of the tariffs. Nike previously stated it had paid around $1 billion in tariffs on imported goods because of those trade measures.
Consumers argue that the U.S. Supreme Court’s February decision striking down the tariffs means Nike may recover a significant portion of those payments from the government. The lawsuit alleges that keeping both the consumer price increases and the refunded tariff money would allow Nike to benefit twice from the same costs.
The complaint states that Nike has not made any legally enforceable promise to reimburse customers for the additional charges tied to tariffs. Plaintiffs are seeking court intervention to prevent the company from retaining what they describe as unfair profits.
Nike has not yet publicly responded to the allegations. The sportswear company joins other major brands facing similar lawsuits, including Costco and Ray-Ban owner EssilorLuxottica, over claims related to tariff refund practices.
During a March 31 earnings conference call, Nike indicated that the fiscal quarter ending in August 2026 could be the final period in which tariffs significantly impact its gross margins. The outcome of the lawsuit may have broader implications for retailers that increased prices during the tariff period.


Trump Says Anthropic No Longer Seen as National Security Threat
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan Suspended as Member States Consider Removal
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Law Enforcement Mask Ban
US Raises Concerns Over Possible ASML EUV Machine Transfer to China
Florida Supreme Court Allows GOP Congressional Map to Stand Ahead of 2026 Midterm Elections
US Appeals Court Keeps Trump’s 10% Global Tariff in Effect During Ongoing Legal Battle
SK Hynix Shares Hit Record High After Shipping Next-Generation HBM4E AI Memory Samples
Trump Administration Delays DeepSeek and CXMT Trade Blacklist Designations Amid U.S.-China Tensions
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court
Carro Expands Into Australia With Acquisition of Used-Car Platform CarPlace
DOJ Investigates Group Linked to Reid Hoffman Over E. Jean Carroll Lawsuit Funding
Saudi Aramco Explores Sulphur Business Stake Sale to Raise Billions
Sable Offshore Wins Key Court Battle Over California Oil Pipeline
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
Google Gemini Co-Lead Noam Shazeer Leaves for OpenAI Amid AI Talent Race 



