Technology / Business

Add as a preferred source on Google

Rights Group Asks State Bank of India to Notify Customers Amid Data Review

SBI found personal information in 3,897 of about 375,000 records it reviewed. It has not confirmed how many distinct customers those records represent.

Updated 2 min read
Customers pass through a bank entrance in Mumbai, India, on a hazy morning. / EconoTimes.ai
Customers pass through a bank entrance in Mumbai, India, on a hazy morning. / EconoTimes.ai

The Internet Freedom Foundation asked State Bank of India (SBI) on Oct. 21 to notify affected customers, as the bank investigates personal information identified in records found on the dark web.

SBI said in its Oct. 21 filing that its preliminary review found personal information in 3,897 records out of about 375,000 examined, as EconoTimes previously reported.

The investigation is checking the material’s authenticity and completeness, tracing where it originated and assessing the exposure’s scope. The review identified names, registered mobile numbers, birth dates, gender, email and residential addresses, branch details, Customer Information File identifiers, lead IDs and information tied to loan and lead records.

The Oct. 16 alerts came from three sources, SBI said: the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), the Defence Cyber Agency and the bank’s threat intelligence provider. The bank began incident response and containment measures and engaged an independent cybersecurity agency empanelled by CERT-In.

In the filing, SBI called it “an incident involving the loss of certain data.” It did not name an attacker or explain how the information reached the dark web. The bank said its core business was operating normally and reported no material financial or continuity impact.

SBI’s filing did not say whether customers had been contacted. The Internet Freedom Foundation, a digital rights group, said it asked SBI to notify every affected customer and explain what information was exposed. The group warned that personal and loan data could be used by someone impersonating a bank employee, but did not report that such fraud had occurred in this case.

The bank gave no completion date for the investigation.

Related articles

View all