NEW YORK, Oct. 21, 2016 -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Signet Jewelers Limited securities (NYSE:SIG) from January 7, 2016 through June 3, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important October 24, 2016 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Signet investors under the federal securities laws.
To join the Signet class action, go to the website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-947.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action.
NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.
According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that (1) Signet was experiencing difficulty ensuring the safety of customers’ jewelry while in the custody of Signet’s brands; (2) Signet’s employees at stores under at least one of Signet’s brands (Kay) were swapping customers’ stones for less valuable stones; (3) Signet was experiencing a decrease in customer confidence; (4) Signet had increasing competitive pressures; (5) consequently, Signet’s financial performance was being negatively impacted; and (6) as a result, defendants’ statements about Signet’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than October 24, 2016. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-947.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact, Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of The Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected]. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.
Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com


Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 



