U.S. President Donald Trump has called for a review of the Federal Judicial Center’s (FJC) scientific reference manual related to climate change, claiming the publication contains "discredited" information that has contributed to significant losses for the United States.
In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump criticized the climate science material used to guide federal judges in evaluating scientific evidence, arguing that the judiciary should rely on what he described as factual and objective science rather than politically influenced information.
"Our Nation’s Federal Judges deserve Facts and Science, not Political Fraud and False Science on Climate," Trump wrote. He added that he was directing federal suspension and debarment officials to review the matter, though he did not specify what conduct or individuals should be investigated.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for additional details regarding the scope of the proposed review or the legal basis for the action.
The latest comments follow an earlier decision by the federal judiciary to withdraw a climate change chapter from the newest edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. The move came after Republican state attorneys general argued that the chapter presented a one-sided view that unfairly favored positions critical of the fossil fuel industry.
The Federal Judicial Center, the research and education arm of the federal judiciary, introduced the climate science chapter as part of the manual’s fourth edition, released in December after years of preparation. The manual is widely used by federal judges to assess scientific testimony and evidence presented in court.
The withdrawn chapter was written by Columbia Law School's Jessica Wentz and Radley Horton. According to its authors, the section was intended to help judges evaluate the admissibility and credibility of expert testimony and documentary evidence involving climate science.
The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was jointly produced by the Federal Judicial Center and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, serving as a key resource for judges handling complex scientific issues in federal litigation.


Chris Hipkins Targets Cost-of-Living Relief in New Zealand Election
Russian Drone Strikes Hit Ukraine-Moldova Border, Kyiv and Sumy
Kim Jong Un Praises North Korean Troops Fighting Overseas
Gulf Ministers to Meet Iran in Oman Over Hormuz Shipping Deal
Volkswagen Job Cuts Put Lower Saxony Leader Under Political Pressure
Israel Destroys Hezbollah Underground Network in Southern Lebanon
Iran Attacks 10 Ships as Hormuz Conflict Escalates
Trump Open to Chinese Automakers Building Cars in US
Russian Drone Strike on Sumy Shopping Centre Kills Two
Trump Rejects Saudi Request for Houthi Strikes
Trump’s Iran War Draws ‘Forever War’ Comparisons
Trump Expects Iran War to End After U.S. Midterms
Russian Strikes Hit Kyiv as Ukraine Targets Russian Cities
Taiwan Flags Russian Film Screening as China-Japan Influence Push
White House Weighs Refined Copper Tariffs as Cost Concerns Grow
Trump Rejects Saudi Request for U.S. Strikes on Houthis
Trump Advisers Warn Iran War Could Last Until 2029 



