Apple Inc faced a setback on Wednesday as it failed to block a massive lawsuit in London. The lawsuit alleges that the tech giant concealed defective batteries in millions of iPhones.
The case, worth up to $2 billion, was brought by British consumer champion Justin Gutmann on behalf of approximately 24 million iPhone users in the United Kingdom. This legal battle seeks damages of up to 1.6 billion pounds ($1.9 billion) plus interest. However, Apple refuted the claims, stating they were baseless, according to Reuters.
Concealed Issues and Throttled Performance
According to Gutmann's lawyers, Apple resorted to concealing battery issues in certain iPhone models. They alleged that the company deliberately "throttled" performance through software updates and installed a power management tool to limit performance.
Despite Apple's denial of defective batteries, except for a few iPhone 6s models, where they offered free battery replacements, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled in favor of Gutmann's case.
The CAT acknowledged "a lack of clarity and specificity" in Gutmann's case that needs resolution before proceeding to trial. The court also raised concerns about Gutmann's litigation funding arrangements following a recent Supreme Court ruling that rendered many such agreements unlawful.
These issues, however, did not hinder the CAT's decision to allow the case to proceed, marking a significant step towards consumer justice, as Gutmann declared.
Apple's Denial and Continuing Litigation
Yahoo reported that an Apple spokesperson reiterated their previous statement, expressing that they have never intentionally shortened the life of any Apple product or degraded the user experience to drive customer upgrades.
The CAT's emphasis on resolving litigation funding arrangements reflects the recent Supreme Court ruling that has prompted a reevaluation of such agreements. This signifies evolving changes in the legal landscape and the need to ensure fair and just proceedings for all parties involved.
The certification of Gutmann's case joins a growing list of high-value mass lawsuits in London's courts. This trend emerged following the approval of claims against major banks for foreign exchange rigging. As more consumers seek justice against alleged corporate misconduct, the expertise of London's legal system is being widely utilized.
Apple's strong denial and defense against the lawsuit highlights the potential implications for the tech industry. The outcome of this case could impact how companies address product issues and communicate with their user base. The resolution of this legal battle may significantly influence consumer trust and confidence.
Photo: Sophia Stark/Unsplash


Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 



