Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
South Korea’s Weak Won Struggles as Retail Investors Pour Money Into U.S. Stocks 
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law 
Silver Prices Plunge in Asian Trade as Dollar Strength Triggers Fresh Precious Metals Sell-Off 
South Africa Eyes ECB Repo Lines as Inflation Eases and Rate Cuts Loom 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Russian Stocks End Mixed as MOEX Index Closes Flat Amid Commodity Strength 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal 
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis 
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
The Seoul Central District Court ruled against customers who filed a lawsuit against the local unit of U.S. electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc., demanding reparations of 10 million won per person.
The plaintiffs claim that they incurred losses as Tesla did not inform them that there would soon be a specifications upgrade at the time of their purchase.
The customers insist that Tesla's specifications upgrade was equivalent to the release of a new car and that the company should have notified them of such a plan.
The customers bought Tesla EVs in March 2019, a month before the carmaker announced the specifications upgrade.
The court, however, ruled that there was no evidence that Tesla explicitly said that it would not be releasing a new car.
The court added that the cars purchased had long been in the market, and there was media and consumer speculation of an upgrade in the works.
