U.S. House Advances GOP Healthcare Bill as ACA Subsidies Near Expiration 
U.S. and China Push for Ceasefire as Thailand–Cambodia Border Clashes Escalate 
Fernando Haddad Confirms He Will Not Run for Office in 2025, Signals Possible Exit as Brazil’s Finance Minister 
Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Washington, D.C. to Continue 
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies 
Kennedy Center Reportedly Renamed Trump-Kennedy Center After Board Vote 
Putin Signals Possible Peace or Continued War in Ukraine at Major Year-End Address 
Barham Salih Elected as Next UN High Commissioner for Refugees 
U.S. Senators Move Toward Deal to Strengthen Military Helicopter Safety Rules 
Trump Expands U.S. Travel Ban to Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Sparking Economic Fears in the Caribbean 
Trump Signs Order to Ease Federal Marijuana Rules, Signaling Major Policy Shift 
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review 
U.S.-Russia Talks in Miami Raise Hopes for Potential Ukraine War Deal 
Dan Bongino to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director After Brief, Controversial Tenure 
Venezuela Seeks UN Security Council Meeting Over U.S. Oil Tanker Blockade 
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools 
EU Delays Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Signing Amid Ukraine War Funding Talks 
President-elect Donald Trump pledged Sunday to terminate birthright citizenship through executive action, sparking immediate controversy and skepticism from legal experts. Speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, Trump outlined sweeping immigration reforms, including plans for mass deportations and curbing automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants.
“We’re going to end that because it’s ridiculous,” Trump said, adding that executive action would be the preferred tool. However, legal experts quickly pointed to the formidable barrier of the 14th Amendment, which has guaranteed birthright citizenship for over 120 years.
Legal Precedent Casts Doubt on Trump’s Plan
The cornerstone of Trump’s proposal faces a legal challenge rooted in the 1898 Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark. The Court ruled that children born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents’ immigration status, are entitled to citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
In an interview with KQED, Leti Volpp, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, emphasized the precedent’s durability. “The legal system is based on precedent, and there has been no chipping away at Wong Kim Ark through other decisions,” Volpp said.
Critics also challenged Trump’s claim that the U.S. is the only country with birthright citizenship. Data from the Library of Congress confirms over 30 nations, including Canada and Brazil, have similar provisions.
Immigration Policies Stir Heated Debate
Beyond birthright citizenship, Trump detailed plans for mass deportations, prioritizing individuals with criminal records but expanding to include broader undocumented populations. His approach to mixed-status families—where some members are U.S. citizens and others are not—has drawn significant scrutiny.
“I don’t want to break up families,” Trump stated, proposing instead to deport entire family units. The policy could impact an estimated 4 million families, raising ethical and legal questions about separating American citizen children from their home country.
Trump ally Tom Homan, the former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, defended the plan, asserting that families can be deported together. Critics argue the policy disregards the rights of American-born children.
Meanwhile, Senator Lindsey Graham announced plans to introduce legislation and pursue a constitutional amendment to end birthright citizenship. Constitutional scholars, however, note the difficulty of amending the Constitution, which requires overwhelming bipartisan support and ratification by 38 state legislatures.
Online Reactions Reflect Public Division
Trump’s comments ignited widespread debate on social media:
- @PolicyWatcher: “Ending birthright citizenship? Sounds unconstitutional and morally questionable. #14thAmendment #ImmigrationReform”
- @LawProfSmith: “Precedent matters. Wong Kim Ark is solid. Trump’s plan will hit a legal brick wall. #Constitution”
- @RealPatriotUSA: “Finally, a leader willing to tackle the immigration mess head-on. Go Trump! #EndBirthrightCitizenship”
- @MigrantVoices: “Deporting families and targeting birthright citizenship? These are human lives, not political props. #ImmigrantRights”
- @GrahamForSenate: “It’s time to stop birthright citizenship abuse. Legislation is coming. #ImmigrationReform”
- @DreamerSupport: “Protect Dreamers, not tear families apart. This isn’t reform; it’s cruelty. #DACA #14thAmendment”
