UN Says Hamas Disrupted Gaza Aid Distribution, Group Denies Allegations 
Iraq PM Visits Washington as U.S. Oil, Gas Deals Take Center Stage 
HHS Watchdog Reports $5.56 Billion in Healthcare Fraud Recoveries as Enforcement Actions Decline 
Trinidad Businessman Dominic Hadeed Appeals Detention Over Alleged Assassination Plot 
EU to Propose New Rules Limiting Children's Access to Social Media 
Meta Says States Seek $1.4 Trillion in Penalties Over Teen Social Media Addiction Lawsuit 
Judge Orders $5.8 Million Payment to E. Jean Carroll After Trump Loses Appeal Bid 
Russia Launches Missile and Drone Attacks on Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Kharkiv 
Trump Recommends Darline Graham for Interim South Carolina Senate Seat 
Trump Administration Sues Maryland Over Alleged Sanctuary Immigration Policies 
Brazil Court Bars Flavio Bolsonaro From Visiting Jair Bolsonaro Ahead of Election 
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Gautam Adani Bribery Case, Citing Foreign Scope 
UK Sanctions 24 Russian-Linked Targets Over Cyberattacks and Election Interference 
In a rebuke to Trump, the Supreme Court rules that birthright citizenship is the law of the land 
Zelenskiy Plans Ukraine Government Shake-Up as Prime Minister Svyrydenko Set to Step Down 
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property 
Venezuela Appoints Felix Plasencia to Lead Foreign Relations and Trade 
A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from withholding roughly $80 million in federal funding used to administer Minnesota’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, amid a legal dispute over alleged fraud and eligibility reviews.
U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino ruled during a hearing in St. Paul that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) likely acted illegally by giving Minnesota only 30 days, until January 15, to review the eligibility of about 100,000 SNAP households. The USDA had warned it would stop reimbursing half of the state’s administrative costs if the deadline was not met, citing concerns over widespread fraud linked to social-welfare programs in Minnesota.
Judge Provinzino said the USDA failed to justify why such an accelerated review was necessary and noted that federal law generally prohibits states from reviewing SNAP recipients’ eligibility more than once per year. She added that Minnesota’s existing operational plan, which limits reviews, had already been approved by the USDA. In her ruling, the judge stated that the federal agency appeared to be pushing the state to violate federal law and its own regulations.
The court order prevents the USDA from withholding the disputed funding while the lawsuit proceeds, including approximately $20 million for the first quarter of the year that the agency had indicated would not be released. The ruling does not affect the monthly SNAP benefits paid directly to recipients, which will continue uninterrupted.
Minnesota officials argued the USDA’s actions were politically motivated, pointing to President Donald Trump’s long-running conflicts with Democratic leaders in the state, including Governor Tim Walz. State attorneys said the funding threat was part of a broader pattern of federal pressure against Minnesota.
The U.S. Department of Justice countered that Minnesota’s past issues with other federally funded programs justified the USDA’s response and claimed the state could temporarily cover the shortfall with its own funds.
SNAP has remained a contentious issue nationally, particularly during Trump’s presidency. The program serves low-income Americans earning less than 130% of the federal poverty level, with maximum monthly benefits in fiscal year 2026 set at $298 for one person and $546 for a two-person household.
