GS Retail Co. has been fined KRW24.4 billion or around $18.7 million, due to unfair practices related to its business dealings with contractors. South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission (FTC) revealed on Tuesday, Aug. 2, that it decided to penalize the supermarket chain company that operates GS25 convenience stores in the country.
As per Yonhap News Agency, aside from the hefty fine, GS Retail Co. was also slapped with a correction order for violations of the “Act on Fair Subcontract Transactions” (Subcontract Act). This means that the FTC also demanded for the company to correct its unfair practices when dealing with its contracted fresh food suppliers.
The anti-trust regulators determined that the company received a total of KRW19.5 billion from eight of its contractors or suppliers for what GS Retail said are for promotion costs and other fees that were collected between November 2016 and September 2019.
The contractors likely agreed as the company entrusted them with the manufacturing of its own brand of fresh food products such as gimbap, rice rolls, and sandwiches which were sold at its convenience store outlets. The FTC explained that GS Retail collected KRW6.87 billion in performance incentives from the mentioned period, and this was carried out without any justifiable reasons.
The commission did not see any valid reason for GS Retail to receive such fees from its subcontractors. This is because the performance incentives are normally the money handed out by suppliers to distributors to encourage them to buy their own products.
It was added that GS Retail also collected a similar fee amounting to KRW2.74 billion from suppliers in the months between February 2020 and April 2021. And again, the FTC said this was obtained without proper reasons.
With the findings, the FTC ruled that the GS25 convenience store operator violated the Subcontracting Act, which prohibits retailers from asking contractors to give economic returns without valid justifications.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that provision fees are not required as the contractors just followed GS Retail’s routine manufacturing instructions. It was noted that these suppliers mainly rely on the supermarket chain company to keep their business going. Finally, in response to FTC’s decision, GS Retail is considering filing an appeal as it expresses regret for the outcome of the investigation that was launched in 2019.


China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record
Gold and Silver Prices Rebound After Volatile Week Triggered by Fed Nomination
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Bank of Japan Signals Readiness for Near-Term Rate Hike as Inflation Nears Target 



