Trump Tells Congress Iran Hostilities Restarted, Citing New 60-Day War Powers Window 
Brazil to Phase Out Gasoline Subsidy First as Diesel Support Stays Longer 
Iran Says It Closes Strait of Hormuz After Warning Shot at Vessel 
Minnesota Wildfires Spread as Governor Tim Walz Deploys National Guard 
Western Allies Push for More Air Defenses for Ukraine at Paris Summit 
US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
Trump Administration Proposes Repeal of 702 Federal Regulations in Major Deregulation Push 
Deutsche Bank Fined A$2 Million by ASIC Over OTC Derivatives Reporting Errors 
Ann Widdecombe Murder: Police Arrest Second Suspect, Rule Out Terrorism Motive 
UK Sanctions 24 Russian-Linked Targets Over Cyberattacks and Election Interference 
Trump, Canada Reach Gordie Howe Bridge Deal Ahead of July 27 Opening 
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property 
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case 
Super Micro Employees Detained in Taiwan AI Server Export Investigation 
Trump Administration Sues Maryland Over Alleged Sanctuary Immigration Policies 
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Gautam Adani Bribery Case, Citing Foreign Scope 
A U.S. federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from tying transportation funding to immigration enforcement compliance. On Thursday, Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island ruled that the U.S. Department of Transportation lacked legal authority to demand cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a condition for federal transportation grants.
The decision came after 20 Democratic-led states sued the administration, arguing that the policy unlawfully pressured them to align with Trump’s hardline immigration agenda. These states, along with their cities and counties, opposed the April 24 directive by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, which threatened to withhold funding unless local governments assisted federal immigration officers.
Judge McConnell, an Obama appointee, issued a preliminary injunction, emphasizing that there was no legitimate connection between immigration cooperation and the congressional purpose of the grants—namely, infrastructure development like highways and bridges. He wrote that Congress did not give the Transportation Secretary the authority to impose such immigration-related conditions.
Since returning to office on January 20, Trump had signed multiple executive orders aimed at penalizing sanctuary jurisdictions—areas that limit cooperation with ICE—by cutting off federal funds. The lawsuit is part of a broader legal pushback against these executive actions.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta praised the ruling, calling it a win for state rights and infrastructure development. “Trump was using transportation funds as leverage to force compliance with his immigration policies,” Bonta said.
The 20 states are also pursuing a related case challenging similar restrictions imposed by the Department of Homeland Security on other federal grant programs.
This ruling reinforces legal limits on federal power to coerce states on immigration enforcement and underscores the ongoing legal clash between sanctuary policies and federal mandates.
