France Keeps Top Health Alert as Officials Brace for Another Heatwave 
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites 
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Journalists Over Air Force One Leak Report 
Zelenskiy Plans Ukraine Government Shake-Up as Prime Minister Svyrydenko Set to Step Down 
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case 
NRC Proposes Radiation Rule Changes to Boost U.S. Nuclear Power Expansion Under Trump 
HHS Watchdog Reports $5.56 Billion in Healthcare Fraud Recoveries as Enforcement Actions Decline 
Iran Says It Closes Strait of Hormuz After Warning Shot at Vessel 
DOJ Grand Jury Investigates UAW President Shawn Fain Ahead of Union Election 
US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days 
ICC Says Darfur War Crimes Probe Reaches Breakthrough in Sudan Investigation 
Ann Widdecombe Murder: Police Arrest Second Suspect, Rule Out Terrorism Motive 
Meta Says States Seek $1.4 Trillion in Penalties Over Teen Social Media Addiction Lawsuit 
Venezuela Appoints Felix Plasencia to Lead Foreign Relations and Trade 
Russia Launches Missile and Drone Attacks on Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Kharkiv 
Trump Signs Memorandum Backing Americans’ Right to Repair Their Own Vehicles 
Sara Duterte Impeachment Trial Opens, Putting 2028 Philippine Election in Focus 
A U.S. federal judge ruled the government violated a court order by attempting to deport six migrants to South Sudan without adequate notice, intensifying tensions between the judiciary and President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
Judge Brian Murphy said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defied his April injunction, which required officials to give migrants a chance to voice safety concerns before being deported to a third country. DHS gave less than 24 hours' notice before loading the migrants onto a plane—deemed “plainly insufficient” by Murphy, who mandated a 10-day notice period moving forward.
The six deportees, from countries including Cuba, Laos, and Myanmar, had been convicted of serious crimes. Still, immigrant rights groups argue that deporting them to war-torn South Sudan without due process violates constitutional protections.
The Biden-appointed judge criticized the DHS for ignoring court directives and warned of possible criminal contempt charges. Despite pressure, Murphy allowed the DHS to keep the migrants abroad for now but required 72-hour interview notice and 15 days to appeal if deportation fears are dismissed.
The White House called Murphy a "far-left activist judge," and DHS described his ruling as "deranged," sparking backlash. Trump advisor Stephen Miller claimed Murphy endangered personnel by interfering with national security.
This case mirrors other legal clashes, including Judge Boasberg’s paused contempt probe over deported Venezuelans and Judge Xinis’s unresolved case involving a deported Maryland resident.
Advocates argue Trump’s immigration crackdown disregards legal norms, with courts repeatedly stepping in to ensure due process. As South Sudan authorities suggest re-deporting the men, Murphy demanded a declaration explaining how U.S. actions comply with international legal standards.
This ruling underscores the legal limits facing Trump’s renewed deportation push amid broader constitutional debates.
