Amy Coney Barrett Faces Conservative Backlash After Key Supreme Court Rulings Against Trump 
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case 
DOJ Orders Crackdown on Birth Tourism After Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship 
US Judge Seeks Explanation for DOJ’s Decision to Drop Gautam Adani Bribery Case 
Israel Sets October 27 Election as Netanyahu Faces Tough Political Test 
Russia Launches Missile and Drone Attacks on Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Kharkiv 
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property 
Brazil Court Bars Flavio Bolsonaro From Visiting Jair Bolsonaro Ahead of Election 
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
EU to Propose New Rules Limiting Children's Access to Social Media 
UK Sanctions 24 Russian-Linked Targets Over Cyberattacks and Election Interference 
Trump Suspends Some Morocco Fertilizer Tariffs to Ease U.S. Supply Shortage 
US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days 
ICC Says Darfur War Crimes Probe Reaches Breakthrough in Sudan Investigation 
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation 
The U.S. Supreme Court continues to back President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement policies, recently allowing the administration to end temporary legal protections for over 800,000 migrants. In two recent rulings, the Court lifted injunctions blocking the termination of humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for migrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua—moves likely to lead to mass deportations.
Despite the broad support, the Court has emphasized constitutional due process. It ruled that migrants must receive adequate notice before removal, rejecting the administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelans under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without proper legal recourse. Justices also criticized the practice of giving detainees only 24 hours’ notice before deportation, calling it unconstitutional.
Trump's hardline policies have drawn legal scrutiny since he resumed office in January, with the Court already intervening in seven immigration-related disputes. Legal experts argue that while the conservative majority often defers to executive power, it is unwilling to overlook blatant violations of legal rights. In April, the Court ordered the release of a wrongfully deported Salvadoran man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, though he remains in custody in El Salvador.
Controversy also surrounds Trump's order to deport migrants to third countries like war-torn South Sudan. A federal judge halted the practice for violating due process, prompting the administration to seek Supreme Court intervention.
While the justices have allowed many deportations to proceed, legal scholars warn that removing legal protections without judicial explanation may set dangerous precedents. The Court is expected to rule soon on Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship—a move that challenges long-held constitutional interpretations. As legal challenges mount, the Court faces the difficult task of balancing executive authority with constitutional protections.
