A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


Nvidia's Jensen Huang Forecasts $1 Trillion in AI Chip Demand Through 2027
Palantir's Maven AI Earns Pentagon "Program of Record" Status, Reshaping Military AI Strategy
OpenAI's Desktop Superapp: Unifying ChatGPT, Codex, and Browser Tools for Enterprise AI
SK Hynix Chairman Warns of Memory Chip Shortage Through 2030 Amid AI Boom
Microsoft Eyes Legal Action as Amazon-OpenAI Deal Threatens Azure Exclusivity
Cyberattack on Stryker Triggers U.S. Government Warning Over Microsoft Intune Security
Xiaomi's AI Model "Hunter Alpha" Mistaken for DeepSeek's Next Release
Trump White House Unveils National AI Policy Framework for Congress
Elliott Investment Management Takes Multibillion-Dollar Stake in Synopsys
Amazon's AWS Could Hit $600 Billion in Revenue as AI Reshapes Cloud Growth
Micron Technology Beats Q2 Earnings Estimates, Issues Strong AI-Driven Outlook
Alibaba Bets on AI Agents to Unify Its Vast Digital Ecosystem
Apple Defies China's Smartphone Slump with Strong Early 2026 Sales
Foxconn Shares Slip After Q4 Profit Miss Despite Record Revenue and Strong AI Outlook
Super Micro Computer Shares Plunge After Co-Founder Charged in AI Chip Smuggling Case
Elon Musk Confirms SpaceX, xAI, and Tesla Will Continue Large-Scale Nvidia Chip Orders
Amazon's "Transformer" Phone: Can It Succeed Where Fire Phone Failed? 



