A former conservative United States appeals court judge has called for a stronger ethics code on the Supreme Court justices. The call follows reports of conservative justice Clarence Thomas’ relations with a major Republican megadonor.
In an interview with Reuters, former judge J. Michael Luttig said Supreme Court justices must be bound to a stronger ethics code compared to lower court judges. Luttig served as a clerk for Chief Justice Warren Burger before serving on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals for 15 years. Luttig is also known to have testified before the House committee investigating the January 6 insurrection.
Luttig said the justices must “be bound by higher standards of conduct” compared to lower-ranked federal judges.
“It’s the titular head of the judicial branch of government and I believe that the expectations for the Supreme Court Justices are rightly tighter than for any other public official in the land,” said Luttig. The former judge did not comment, however, when pressed by Reuters on the report by ProPublica that revealed the relationship between Thomas and Crow that included real estate purchases and luxury trips paid for by the GOP megadonor.
The reports have since raised questions over potential conflicts of interest in the courts, especially as Supreme Court Justices are not bound to a code of conduct. Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin scheduled a hearing on the matter next week, inviting Chief Justice John Roberts to testify before the committee. Roberts declined to testify in a letter to Durbin on Thursday.
Durbin responded to Roberts’ letter in a statement, saying that ethics reform for the Supreme Court must happen whether or not the justices participate in the process. Durbin also stressed the need for Congress to establish a code of ethics for the highest court in the country.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department has challenged a new law in Tennessee that banned doctors from providing gender-affirming medical care for transgender youths, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgery. The DOJ said the law violated the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which promised equal protection.
The DOJ also said it was requesting the court to issue an immediate order preventing the law from taking effect on July 1.


UN Warns Gaza Humanitarian Aid at Risk as Israel Registration Rules Threaten NGO Operations
Pakistan’s Army Chief Faces Gaza Troop Dilemma Amid US Pressure
U.S. Senators Move Toward Deal to Strengthen Military Helicopter Safety Rules
Honduras Election Recount Delayed Amid Protests and Political Tensions
Lukashenko Urges Swift Ukraine Peace Deal, Backs Trump’s Push for Rapid Resolution
European Leaders Tie Ukraine Territorial Decisions to Strong Security Guarantees
Trump Announces $1,776 Cash Bonus for U.S. Military Personnel Ahead of Christmas
Sydney Bondi Beach Shooting Sparks Calls for Stronger Protection of Jewish Community in Australia
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Dan Bongino to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director After Brief, Controversial Tenure
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Venezuela Seeks UN Security Council Meeting Over U.S. Oil Tanker Blockade
Trump Administration Plans Major Increase in Denaturalization Cases for Naturalized U.S. Citizens
Taiwan Political Standoff Deepens as President Lai Urges Parliament to Withdraw Disputed Laws
Trump Taps Former DHS Official Troy Edgar for U.S. Ambassador Role in El Salvador
U.S. House Advances GOP Healthcare Bill as ACA Subsidies Near Expiration
U.S.-Russia Talks in Miami Raise Hopes for Potential Ukraine War Deal 



