Samsung Q2 Profit Hits Record on AI Memory Boom as Shares Tumble 
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites 
US Judge Seeks Explanation for DOJ’s Decision to Drop Gautam Adani Bribery Case 
SK Hynix’s $28 Billion U.S. Share Sale Draws Massive Demand Amid AI Chip Boom 
Australia Flags Child Safety Gaps at Apple, Meta, Google Over Online Sexual Extortion 
EU Weighs New Trade Restrictions on Israeli West Bank Settlements 
Apple Sues OpenAI, Former Employees Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft 
US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
Brazil Court Bars Flavio Bolsonaro From Visiting Jair Bolsonaro Ahead of Election 
Nvidia Tightens AI Chip Sales in Asia With Stricter Customer Approval Process 
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge 
China Trade Surplus Hits $125.6 Billion as June Exports, Imports Smash Forecasts 
Trump Administration Sues Maryland Over Alleged Sanctuary Immigration Policies 
Morgan Stanley Says China’s Reusable Rocket Progress Poses Long-Term Challenge to SpaceX 
ICC Says Darfur War Crimes Probe Reaches Breakthrough in Sudan Investigation 
OpenAI Executive Fidji Simo to Step Down Amid Health Challenges Ahead of IPO 
The US Supreme Court will examine the effects of a law known as Section 230, which has protected tech companies from lawsuits related to their platforms’ content since 1996, to a case related to the November 2015 attacks in Paris.
The top court in the U.S. will continue its consideration of a very similar case, but this time asking if platforms should be subject to anti-terrorism laws.
The relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, one of the 130 victims of the attacks in the French capital, blamed Google-owned YouTube for having recommended videos from the jihadist group to users, helping along the call to violence.
According to the relatives, Google assisted ISIS in spreading its message and thus providing material support by recommending the terrorist’s videos to users.
The complaint was dismissed by the federal courts on behalf of a law,
Section 230 states that in the US internet companies cannot be considered publishers and have legal immunity for the content posted on their platforms.
But the complainants insist that the highly complex recommendation systems perfected by big platforms fall out of the scope of Section 230.
The nine justices will examine and their ruling, expected by June 30, could have huge repercussions for the future of the internet.
