TSMC Japan's Second Fab to Produce 3nm Chips by 2028 
Fonterra Admits Anchor Butter "Grass-Fed" Label Misled Consumers After Greenpeace Lawsuit 
UPS and Teamsters Reach Agreement to Limit Driver Severance Program 
Pershing Square Bids €30.40 Per Share to Acquire Universal Music Group in $9.4B Deal 
Private Credit Under Pressure: Is a Slow-Motion Crisis Unfolding? 
SpaceX IPO: Retail Investors to Play Historic Role in Record-Breaking Public Offering 
Britain Courts Anthropic Amid US Defense Department Dispute 
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman 
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk 
MATCH Act Targets ASML and Chinese Chipmakers in New U.S. Export Crackdown 
First Western Ship Transits Strait of Hormuz Since Iran War Began 
OpenAI Executive Shake-Up Ahead of Anticipated 2026 IPO 
LG Electronics Posts Record Q1 Revenue Amid Strong Demand and Cost Improvements 
Paramount Skydance Secures $24B from Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds for Warner Bros. Discovery Takeover 
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute 
Elon Musk Ties SpaceX IPO Access to Mandatory Grok AI Subscriptions 
Nike Beats Q3 Estimates but China Weakness and Margin Pressure Weigh on Outlook 
TAMPA BAY, Fla., Feb. 27, 2017 -- While the consequences of data breaches in many industries include public embarrassment, business loss and fines, an informal survey of Tampa Bay area law firms suggests that cyber-attacks in the legal profession also risk significant real and punitive damages, loss of clients and even potential closure of the firm itself.
The poll findings, based on confidential interviews by IT assurance and compliance firm 360 Advanced with six Tampa Bay managing partners, suggest that while most of the large, multi-national firms headquartered in Tampa Bay have what they believe are adequate defenses against cyber-attacks, smaller firms may not.
“They think they can’t afford to have those controls in place, but the alternative is much more costly. They have the same risks we do,” commented one principal with a large national Tampa law firm. She said her firm spends “an enormous amount energy and of money” on data security, both for the firm and its clients, and has invested even more recently as news of law firm breaches becomes more common. “This is only going to escalate as the bad guys follow the money,” she said.
Recent high-profile cyber-attack cases include a breach at Panamanian firm Mossack Fonseca, where millions of documents detailing offshore client holdings were made public. Last fall, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced indictments of data thieves who had used stolen information on upcoming M&A deals to profit on the stock market.
Eric Ratcliffe, Director of Client Development at 360 Advanced, said because their client data can be held for ransom, targets for cyber-thieves also can include firms handling confidential financial settlements in divorce or federal tax cases, patent applications, critically sensitive personal injury and healthcare litigation, to name a few.
“We have a data privacy team dedicated to cyber defense and a secured operations center monitoring inbound threats,” commented a leading Bay Area attorney. “It’s a concern for everyone. Everyone is breachable. We are attractive targets.”
He pointed out that having an established, formal system of data protection that is regularly reviewed and tested can be a defense against a claim of liability, while the opposite is also true. “We prepare for the worst,” he said.
Another law firm principal, who is also a leading white collar crime expert, commented that a cyber-breach of a client matter destroys trust and will inevitably lead to client loss. “When private matters become public, the future of your firm may be at stake,” he said.
Contact: Eric Ratcliffe [email protected] 866.418.1708 ext.710
