OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
TAMPA BAY, Fla., Feb. 27, 2017 -- While the consequences of data breaches in many industries include public embarrassment, business loss and fines, an informal survey of Tampa Bay area law firms suggests that cyber-attacks in the legal profession also risk significant real and punitive damages, loss of clients and even potential closure of the firm itself.
The poll findings, based on confidential interviews by IT assurance and compliance firm 360 Advanced with six Tampa Bay managing partners, suggest that while most of the large, multi-national firms headquartered in Tampa Bay have what they believe are adequate defenses against cyber-attacks, smaller firms may not.
“They think they can’t afford to have those controls in place, but the alternative is much more costly. They have the same risks we do,” commented one principal with a large national Tampa law firm. She said her firm spends “an enormous amount energy and of money” on data security, both for the firm and its clients, and has invested even more recently as news of law firm breaches becomes more common. “This is only going to escalate as the bad guys follow the money,” she said.
Recent high-profile cyber-attack cases include a breach at Panamanian firm Mossack Fonseca, where millions of documents detailing offshore client holdings were made public. Last fall, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced indictments of data thieves who had used stolen information on upcoming M&A deals to profit on the stock market.
Eric Ratcliffe, Director of Client Development at 360 Advanced, said because their client data can be held for ransom, targets for cyber-thieves also can include firms handling confidential financial settlements in divorce or federal tax cases, patent applications, critically sensitive personal injury and healthcare litigation, to name a few.
“We have a data privacy team dedicated to cyber defense and a secured operations center monitoring inbound threats,” commented a leading Bay Area attorney. “It’s a concern for everyone. Everyone is breachable. We are attractive targets.”
He pointed out that having an established, formal system of data protection that is regularly reviewed and tested can be a defense against a claim of liability, while the opposite is also true. “We prepare for the worst,” he said.
Another law firm principal, who is also a leading white collar crime expert, commented that a cyber-breach of a client matter destroys trust and will inevitably lead to client loss. “When private matters become public, the future of your firm may be at stake,” he said.
Contact: Eric Ratcliffe [email protected] 866.418.1708 ext.710
