Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns 
WASHINGTON, Jan. 13, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) President Chet Thompson announces the association's decision to intervene in the lawsuit brought by the ethanol industry against the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) use of its general waiver authority to lower renewable fuel volumes under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007:
"AFPM filed a motion to intervene to support EPA's interpretation and use of its legal waiver authority to reduce the mandated amounts of renewable fuels to be blended into the nation's fuel supply. EPA's decision to lower volume requirements was the only justifiable option given market realities and the failure to do so would have been arbitrary and capricious.
"This lawsuit is another effort by the ethanol industry to force increased amounts of ethanol produced by the petitioners' members on consumers through an unpopular government mandate, and ignores not only the E10 blend wall but also strong consumer rejection of higher-ethanol fuels."
CONTACT: [email protected]
