Shiba Inu’s Kusama Strikes Back at Critics, Declares 'Send SHIB to the Moon' Mission Is on Track 
Huawei’s AI Chip Struggles: 7nm Tech Falls Generations Behind NVIDIA Due to US Sanctions, TSMC Blockade 
Federal Workers Fear Mass Firings as Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy Promise Government Overhaul: 'Billions Could Be Cut!' 
Biden Rushes Loan Forgiveness for Ukraine Before Potential Policy Shift 
Healthy soils are good for your gut, brain and wellbeing – here’s why 
S&P 500 Climbs on Cyclical Stocks as Nvidia and Alphabet Diverge Amid Fed Speculation 
We rated the urban forests of 8 global cities – only Singapore passed the 30% canopy test 
Fed's Goolsbee Expects Rates to Drop 'Fair Bit Lower,' Cautions on Slowing Cuts 
Why is it so difficult to make a new antibiotic? 
Bitcoin ETFs Hit $104 Billion, Outpacing Gold ETFs in Growth Amid Post-Election Market Optimism 
5 Crucial Metrics Shaping Ethereum’s Next Move: Whale Activity and Network Growth in Focus 
The power of one: solitary carnivores outkill group hunters 
Google Faces DOJ Pressure to Sell Chrome, Android, and AI Stakes to Fix Search Monopoly 
Xiaomi's Second Electric SUV to Challenge Tesla Model Y in Q1 2025, Report Reveals 
Time is running out for a treaty to end plastic pollution – here’s why it matters 
As Colombia hosts a UN biodiversity summit, its own Amazonian rainforest is in crisis 
Like Pennsylvania's publicly traded Stronghold, Bitcoin mining companies increasingly tap into coal ash for energy, sparking concerns over environmental repercussions. As Bitcoin's carbon footprint grows, the debate on sustainable mining solutions gains momentum.
With a total capacity of 165 MW, Stronghold owns two coal ash sites, utilizing this readily available commodity to meet their energy demands. However, concerns about the environmental impact of this practice have emerged. Bitcoin's current energy consumption already rivals Pakistan's, and its carbon footprint continues to grow due to intensive mining operations.
Proponents argue that coal ash presents a potential solution to some of Bitcoin's issues by transforming an environmental and health hazard into a resource, freeing up land for more productive purposes. Nevertheless, critics disagree, emphasizing that burning coal ash generates substantial greenhouse gas emissions, merely shifting the pollution from the ground to the air.
Moreover, experts warn that fossil fuel-generated energy, not limited to waste coal, exacerbates the problem. Bitcoin operations extend the lifespan of coal and gas plants scheduled for closure, undermining global decarbonization goals.
According to a recent report by the US NGO Global Energy Monitor, all coal plants worldwide must be shut down by 2040 to mitigate the risk of climate catastrophe.
The detrimental impact of coal-powered Bitcoin mining on decarbonization efforts has gained significant attention. New York has already placed a moratorium on new permits for fossil fuel plants involved in cryptocurrency mining, recognizing the threat they pose to sustainable energy transition. Further measures to address this pressing issue are likely to be implemented in the future.
As the demand for Bitcoin continues to surge, the debate surrounding the use of coal ash and its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is poised to intensify. Environmental activists and policymakers are calling for more sustainable energy solutions to ensure the clean future of cryptocurrency mining.
Photo: Kanchanara/Unsplash
