Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake 
Drug pollution in water is making salmon take more risks – new research 
Wildfires ignite infection risks, by weakening the body’s immune defences and spreading bugs in smoke 
Oil Prices Fall as U.S. Crude Inventories Surge and Hormuz Tensions Persist 
Antofagasta Shares Drop 5% as Miner Cuts 2026 Copper Production Forecast 
What’s so special about Ukraine’s minerals? A geologist explains 
Canada-US Trade Talks Gain Momentum Ahead of Aug. 19 Tariff Deadline 
Super Micro Stock Jumps 19% as AI Server Demand Drives Strong 2027 Outlook 
Burkina Faso and Mali’s fabulous flora: new plant life record released 
Thousands of satellites are due to burn up in the atmosphere every year – damaging the ozone layer and changing the climate 
Rise of the Zombie Bugs takes readers on a jaw-dropping tour of the parasite world 
US Dollar Slips as Softer PPI Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Expectations 
Asian Stocks Rise as AI Chip Rally Lifts South Korea, Japan 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Like Pennsylvania's publicly traded Stronghold, Bitcoin mining companies increasingly tap into coal ash for energy, sparking concerns over environmental repercussions. As Bitcoin's carbon footprint grows, the debate on sustainable mining solutions gains momentum.
With a total capacity of 165 MW, Stronghold owns two coal ash sites, utilizing this readily available commodity to meet their energy demands. However, concerns about the environmental impact of this practice have emerged. Bitcoin's current energy consumption already rivals Pakistan's, and its carbon footprint continues to grow due to intensive mining operations.
Proponents argue that coal ash presents a potential solution to some of Bitcoin's issues by transforming an environmental and health hazard into a resource, freeing up land for more productive purposes. Nevertheless, critics disagree, emphasizing that burning coal ash generates substantial greenhouse gas emissions, merely shifting the pollution from the ground to the air.
Moreover, experts warn that fossil fuel-generated energy, not limited to waste coal, exacerbates the problem. Bitcoin operations extend the lifespan of coal and gas plants scheduled for closure, undermining global decarbonization goals.
According to a recent report by the US NGO Global Energy Monitor, all coal plants worldwide must be shut down by 2040 to mitigate the risk of climate catastrophe.
The detrimental impact of coal-powered Bitcoin mining on decarbonization efforts has gained significant attention. New York has already placed a moratorium on new permits for fossil fuel plants involved in cryptocurrency mining, recognizing the threat they pose to sustainable energy transition. Further measures to address this pressing issue are likely to be implemented in the future.
As the demand for Bitcoin continues to surge, the debate surrounding the use of coal ash and its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is poised to intensify. Environmental activists and policymakers are calling for more sustainable energy solutions to ensure the clean future of cryptocurrency mining.
Photo: Kanchanara/Unsplash
