How ongoing deforestation is rooted in colonialism and its management practices 
U.S. Dollar Drops as Weak Jobs Data Boosts Fed Pause Bets, Yen Jumps on Intervention Talk 
Trump Reports $1.4 Billion in Crypto Income as Digital Assets Become Top Wealth Source 
Kawasaki Heavy Shares Slide on Report of ¥200 Billion Capital Raise Plan 
US Resumes Dollar Shipments to Iraq After Months-Long Suspension 
SK Holdings, KKR Launch $1.3B Renewable Energy Venture in South Korea 
South Korea Warns Won Is Undervalued, Boosts FX Coordination With Japan 
What’s so special about Ukraine’s minerals? A geologist explains 
FxWirePro- Major Crypto levels and bias summary 
As the Black Summer megafires neared, people rallied to save wildlife and domestic animals. But it came at a real cost 
ShareChat Eyes 2027 IPO After Reaching Operational Profitability, Report Says 
New Zealand Consumer Confidence Rises in June as Inflation Expectations Ease 
Drug pollution in water is making salmon take more risks – new research 
Thousands of satellites are due to burn up in the atmosphere every year – damaging the ozone layer and changing the climate 
Like Pennsylvania's publicly traded Stronghold, Bitcoin mining companies increasingly tap into coal ash for energy, sparking concerns over environmental repercussions. As Bitcoin's carbon footprint grows, the debate on sustainable mining solutions gains momentum.
With a total capacity of 165 MW, Stronghold owns two coal ash sites, utilizing this readily available commodity to meet their energy demands. However, concerns about the environmental impact of this practice have emerged. Bitcoin's current energy consumption already rivals Pakistan's, and its carbon footprint continues to grow due to intensive mining operations.
Proponents argue that coal ash presents a potential solution to some of Bitcoin's issues by transforming an environmental and health hazard into a resource, freeing up land for more productive purposes. Nevertheless, critics disagree, emphasizing that burning coal ash generates substantial greenhouse gas emissions, merely shifting the pollution from the ground to the air.
Moreover, experts warn that fossil fuel-generated energy, not limited to waste coal, exacerbates the problem. Bitcoin operations extend the lifespan of coal and gas plants scheduled for closure, undermining global decarbonization goals.
According to a recent report by the US NGO Global Energy Monitor, all coal plants worldwide must be shut down by 2040 to mitigate the risk of climate catastrophe.
The detrimental impact of coal-powered Bitcoin mining on decarbonization efforts has gained significant attention. New York has already placed a moratorium on new permits for fossil fuel plants involved in cryptocurrency mining, recognizing the threat they pose to sustainable energy transition. Further measures to address this pressing issue are likely to be implemented in the future.
As the demand for Bitcoin continues to surge, the debate surrounding the use of coal ash and its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is poised to intensify. Environmental activists and policymakers are calling for more sustainable energy solutions to ensure the clean future of cryptocurrency mining.
Photo: Kanchanara/Unsplash
