Drug pollution in water is making salmon take more risks – new research 
Global Markets Brace for Fed Rate Hike as Oil Tops $91 
OpenAI Nears Astra AI Model Launch With Safety Focus 
Dollar Holds Near Two-Week High as Fed Rate Hike Bets Rise 
Brazil, US Resume Tariff Talks as Trade Tensions Persist 
US Tech Giants’ AI Bond Boom Raises Euro Zone Borrowing Risks 
Shein Shares Drop 5% After Weak Hong Kong IPO Debut 
Asian Currencies Weaken as Dollar Rises, Kiwi Slides After RBNZ Hike 
OpenAI Rejects Apple Trade Secret Theft Claims 
CATL Shares Fall as Hungary Plant Faces Safety Halt 
Amazon Shares Fall as FTC Plans Ad Pricing Lawsuit 
How to create a thriving forest, not box-checking ‘tree cover’ 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Like Pennsylvania's publicly traded Stronghold, Bitcoin mining companies increasingly tap into coal ash for energy, sparking concerns over environmental repercussions. As Bitcoin's carbon footprint grows, the debate on sustainable mining solutions gains momentum.
With a total capacity of 165 MW, Stronghold owns two coal ash sites, utilizing this readily available commodity to meet their energy demands. However, concerns about the environmental impact of this practice have emerged. Bitcoin's current energy consumption already rivals Pakistan's, and its carbon footprint continues to grow due to intensive mining operations.
Proponents argue that coal ash presents a potential solution to some of Bitcoin's issues by transforming an environmental and health hazard into a resource, freeing up land for more productive purposes. Nevertheless, critics disagree, emphasizing that burning coal ash generates substantial greenhouse gas emissions, merely shifting the pollution from the ground to the air.
Moreover, experts warn that fossil fuel-generated energy, not limited to waste coal, exacerbates the problem. Bitcoin operations extend the lifespan of coal and gas plants scheduled for closure, undermining global decarbonization goals.
According to a recent report by the US NGO Global Energy Monitor, all coal plants worldwide must be shut down by 2040 to mitigate the risk of climate catastrophe.
The detrimental impact of coal-powered Bitcoin mining on decarbonization efforts has gained significant attention. New York has already placed a moratorium on new permits for fossil fuel plants involved in cryptocurrency mining, recognizing the threat they pose to sustainable energy transition. Further measures to address this pressing issue are likely to be implemented in the future.
As the demand for Bitcoin continues to surge, the debate surrounding the use of coal ash and its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is poised to intensify. Environmental activists and policymakers are calling for more sustainable energy solutions to ensure the clean future of cryptocurrency mining.
Photo: Kanchanara/Unsplash
