Developer Treyarch is now facing yet another “Black Ops 4” controversy after releasing a skin that’s identical to an already existing outfit. The skins in questions are the Fall and Classic outfit for the Battery specialist.
One look at the design and the outrage of “Black Ops 4” players are pretty understandable, especially since reserves takes a significant amount of time to obtain. Diluting these reserves with such similar rewards is essentially wasting a player’s grinding effort.
Laughably enough, the only difference seen in the “Black Ops 4” Battery skins is the slight shade of green for the Fall outfit and the scissors having varying colors. That’s it, the rest are damningly similar.
Black Ops 4 faces one controversy after another
This “Black Ops 4” controversy reared its head shortly after the game suffered downtime due to server issues. What’s more, Activision has yet to provide an explanation about the supposed toxic environment it has created inside its studio, specifically to those who are working as quality assurance testers.
To put briefly, quality assurance testers have been apparently treated as “second class citizens” and have been subjected to grueling hours of crunch time. To make matters worse, these “Black Ops 4” QA testers are being paid $13 an hour and are working 70 hours a week. Adding salt to the wound is the fact that new CFO Dennis Durkin was given a $15 million worth of cash and stock bonus after Spencer Neumann was poached by Netflix to take up similar position for the streaming giant, Bloomberg reported.
Black Ops 4 problems due to the studio's toxic working environment?
“We’re getting paid these very minimal amounts working these ridiculous hours, yet these people are getting paid absurd amounts of money. It’s just a culture of not being cared about,” one QA tester told Jason Schreier of Kotaku. With such culture seething within the doors of Treyarch and Activision, one can’t help but think that it’s somehow connected to these recent blunders seen in “Black Ops 4.”
Players over at Reddit are already questioning the aforementioned skin designs and what sort of decisions are being made that resulted in such a lazy mistake. Others aren't surprised about the gaff and are saying that they “feel” this problem has been persisting for some time and this new issue is merely highlighting an already existing controversy.


Samsung and SK Hynix Shares Jump After Micron Earnings Boost AI Chip Optimism
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks
Alibaba Shares Fall After Anthropic Alleges Massive AI Model Distillation Campaign
Trump Says Anthropic No Longer Seen as National Security Threat
US-Iran De-Escalation Shifts Washington’s Focus to AI Regulation and Crypto Legislation
Alphabet Stock Slides as AI Talent Exodus and SpaceX Losses Shake Investor Confidence
Doncasters Raises $919 Million in NYSE IPO as Aerospace Growth Accelerates
Samsung Electronics Stock Surges on Report of Massive $59 Billion Share Buyback Plan
Qualcomm Nears $4 Billion Acquisition of AI Chip Startup Modular
WiseTech Global Denies Knowledge of Investigation Into Founder Richard White
Today’s space race could turn fatal if we don’t agree on new rules
Tencent Reviews Marvelous Stake as Gaming Giant Reassesses Global Investment Strategy
World Cup technology: from ref cams to AI analysts, cutting-edge research is changing the game
SpaceX Stock Plunges 16% as KeyBanc Warns Valuation May Be Overstretched
Micron Stock Surges on Strong AI Demand, Record Revenue, and Bullish Q4 Forecast
How AI prompting turned writerly description into an everyday skill 



