JPMorgan’s Top Large-Cap Pharma Stocks to Watch in 2026 
AstraZeneca’s LATIFY Phase III Trial of Ceralasertib Misses Primary Endpoint in Lung Cancer Study 
ByteDance Plans Massive AI Investment in 2026 to Close Gap With U.S. Tech Giants 
FDA Approves Mitapivat for Anemia in Thalassemia Patients 
Nvidia and Groq Strike Strategic AI Inference Licensing Deal 
Saks Global Weighs Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Debt Pressures and Luxury Retail Slowdown 
Boeing Wins $2.04B U.S. Air Force Contract for B-52 Engine Replacement Program 
Hanwha Signals Readiness to Build Nuclear-Powered Submarines at Philly Shipyard for U.S. Navy 
Nike Stock Jumps After Apple CEO Tim Cook Buys $2.9M Worth of Shares 
Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling 
TSMC Honors Japanese Chip Equipment Makers With 2025 Supplier Awards 
Novo Nordisk Stock Surges After FDA Approves Wegovy Pill for Weight Loss 
Mexico Antitrust Review of Viva Aerobus–Volaris Deal Signals Growth for Airline Sector 
Waymo Plans Safety and Emergency Response Upgrades After San Francisco Robotaxi Disruptions 
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training 
Warner Bros Discovery Weighs Amended Paramount Skydance Bid as Netflix Takeover Battle Intensifies 
 (VEON) - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Sept. 25, 2017 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces Class Action update regarding VEON, Ltd. (“VEON” or the Company”) (NASDAQ:VEON), previously known as VimpelCom, Ltd.
On December 9, 2016, Lead Plaintiff in the action filed an amended class action complaint. The amended complaint asserts claims on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased VimpelCom securities (now VEON) between December 4, 2010 and November 3, 2015 inclusive (the “Class Period”), and seeks to pursue violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10(b)-5 promulgated thereunder. Recently, the Court issued an important decision which denied the Company’s attempt to dismiss the class action. In particular, the Court’s decision denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss and sustained most of the claims in the amended class action complaint.
A copy of the amended class action complaint and the Court’s decision can be found at our website at www.gme-law.com.
If you wish to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
