Germany is grappling with challenges in funding increased defense spending to meet NATO’s target of 2% of GDP, with some analysts suggesting an even higher goal of 4%. Commerzbank (ETR:CBKG) highlights the country’s sluggish economic growth, projected at just 0.5% annually, as a major barrier. Without faster growth, achieving 4% spending could take two decades—an impractical timeline both politically and strategically.
Historically, higher economic growth enabled nations like Germany to accommodate robust defense budgets as rising GDP boosted government revenues. Today, reallocating funds from other federal budget areas, such as civilian or social spending, could help bridge the gap. However, achieving the necessary savings would require cuts of nearly 20% in federal civilian spending over four years, an unlikely scenario given current constraints.
Debt financing is another potential solution but comes with significant legal and economic challenges. Increasing defense spending through borrowing would double Germany’s budget deficit from 2% to 4% of GDP, breaching European debt rules and the constitutional debt brake. Additionally, Germany's weak economic growth has raised risk premiums on government bonds, further complicating debt-based strategies.
Redirecting funds from climate initiatives or optimizing carbon pricing could generate savings but is likely to face political resistance. Structural reforms aimed at boosting economic productivity and tax revenues are critical to ensuring sustainable public finances. Investments in growth sectors and increased efficiency could ease the fiscal burden while supporting higher defense spending.
Germany’s reliance on shadow funds to finance essential tasks like defense underscores the urgent need to integrate these expenditures into the regular budget. Without substantial economic reform, achieving NATO’s defense spending goals will remain a formidable challenge.