In midst of the winter parliamentary session, the government is keen to gain traction on the key Goods and Services Tax (GST) bill. Passage of the latter will provide the much-needed impetus on big-ticket reforms. Towards this end, the much-awaited GST panel tabled its proposals. It recommended a revenue neutral rate of 15.0-15.5% (excluding petroleum, real estate, alcohol and electricity). This rate is meant to be fiscally neutral for the state and central government's finances.
While the panel prefers a single unified rate, it also laid out a rate structure to give flexibility to policy choices. One of the options is to impose a lower 12% rate on essential goods, 40% on luxury items (tobacco, luxury cars etc.) and the remaining taxed at 17-18%. All services could be pegged at the standard 17- 18% level. It was also proposed to scrap the additional 1% inter-state tax for manufacturing states. The decision on the exact rate and revenue-sharing would be left to the GST council which will be formed after the constitutional amendments are passed.
The committee estimates minimal inflationary and fiscal implications from this revenue neutral rate. But intermittent price pressures are likely as services taxes are raised from the current 14.5% to 17-18%, while product taxes are fine-tuned (few lowered). To compensate for any fiscal pressure on states, the revenue compensation period of five years is under consideration. Passage of the GST bill will be a boost to revive the Make in India policy and improve the ease of doing business by subsuming plethora of taxes/ exemptions in the system. On growth, a Thirteenth Finance Commission taskforce estimated that the boost to growth could be in the range of 0.9-1.7% of GDP.
At this stage, these proposals are not binding. If these recommendations are accepted, these will built into the GST bill that is pending in the upper house. Prima facie, the proposals fulfil some of the key objections raised by the opposition parties, increasing the odds that the GST bill will pass through this parliament sitting.
"Considering the logistical and technological architecture that needs to be put in place before this unified rate becomes effective, we see the risk that the Apr16 implementation deadline will be missed and delayed to second half of 2016", notes DBS Group Research.


Peru Election 2026: Sanchez Takes Narrow Lead Over Fujimori
Trump Nominates Todd Blanche for Attorney General, Setting Up Key Senate Confirmation Battle
Japan Producer Prices Surge in May, Strengthening Expectations of BOJ Rate Hike
Ukraine and Latvia Sign Drone Defense Deal to Boost Military Cooperation in 2026
Asian Stocks Rebound as AI and Chip Shares Recover; Easing Iran Tensions Boost Sentiment
Peru Presidential Election Too Close to Call as Ipsos Quick Count Shows Statistical Tie
Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit
Israel Strikes Iran Petrochemical Site as Trump Presses for Restraint Amid Peace Talks
US Dollar Slips Ahead of Key Inflation Data as Middle East Tensions Weigh on Markets
Trump Administration Urges Judge to Allow UFC Event on White House Lawn
Trump Says Iran Downed U.S. Apache Helicopter in Strait of Hormuz, Vows Response
Japan Wholesale Inflation Accelerates to 6.3% in May, Exceeding Forecasts
US Urges Europe to Impose Ebola Travel Restrictions Ahead of FIFA World Cup 2026
US Dollar Dips as Middle East Tensions Ease; Markets Await Key US Inflation Data
Australian Consumer Sentiment Drops in June as Financial Concerns Weigh on Households 



