In midst of the winter parliamentary session, the government is keen to gain traction on the key Goods and Services Tax (GST) bill. Passage of the latter will provide the much-needed impetus on big-ticket reforms. Towards this end, the much-awaited GST panel tabled its proposals. It recommended a revenue neutral rate of 15.0-15.5% (excluding petroleum, real estate, alcohol and electricity). This rate is meant to be fiscally neutral for the state and central government's finances.
While the panel prefers a single unified rate, it also laid out a rate structure to give flexibility to policy choices. One of the options is to impose a lower 12% rate on essential goods, 40% on luxury items (tobacco, luxury cars etc.) and the remaining taxed at 17-18%. All services could be pegged at the standard 17- 18% level. It was also proposed to scrap the additional 1% inter-state tax for manufacturing states. The decision on the exact rate and revenue-sharing would be left to the GST council which will be formed after the constitutional amendments are passed.
The committee estimates minimal inflationary and fiscal implications from this revenue neutral rate. But intermittent price pressures are likely as services taxes are raised from the current 14.5% to 17-18%, while product taxes are fine-tuned (few lowered). To compensate for any fiscal pressure on states, the revenue compensation period of five years is under consideration. Passage of the GST bill will be a boost to revive the Make in India policy and improve the ease of doing business by subsuming plethora of taxes/ exemptions in the system. On growth, a Thirteenth Finance Commission taskforce estimated that the boost to growth could be in the range of 0.9-1.7% of GDP.
At this stage, these proposals are not binding. If these recommendations are accepted, these will built into the GST bill that is pending in the upper house. Prima facie, the proposals fulfil some of the key objections raised by the opposition parties, increasing the odds that the GST bill will pass through this parliament sitting.
"Considering the logistical and technological architecture that needs to be put in place before this unified rate becomes effective, we see the risk that the Apr16 implementation deadline will be missed and delayed to second half of 2016", notes DBS Group Research.


Goldman Sachs Says China Competition Weighs More on EU Growth Than Trade Deficit
Oil Prices Slip as Iran Talks and Strong Supply Outlook Ease Market Concerns
Trump Administration Declines USMCA Renewal, Opens Talks on New Trade Changes
Trump Administration to Launch Voluntary AI Standards for Frontier Models
Oil Prices Slip as Oversupply Concerns and U.S.-Iran Talks Shape Market Outlook
Khamenei Funeral Draws Thousands as Iran Stages Nationwide Week of Mourning
Japan Signals Surprise Yen Intervention Strategy as BOJ Hawkish Stance Puts FX Traders on Alert
Russian Attacks Kill Three in Eastern Ukraine as Civilian Casualties Mount
Asian Currencies Stay Under Pressure as Dollar Holds Near 13-Month High Ahead of U.S. Jobs Report
US Resumes Dollar Shipments to Iraq After Months-Long Suspension
US Jobs Report Preview: June Payroll Growth Seen Slowing as Fed Rate Decision Looms
South Korea Warns Won Is Undervalued, Boosts FX Coordination With Japan
Air Force Investigates Officer After Capitol Protest Calling for Trump, Vance Impeachment 



