In midst of the winter parliamentary session, the government is keen to gain traction on the key Goods and Services Tax (GST) bill. Passage of the latter will provide the much-needed impetus on big-ticket reforms. Towards this end, the much-awaited GST panel tabled its proposals. It recommended a revenue neutral rate of 15.0-15.5% (excluding petroleum, real estate, alcohol and electricity). This rate is meant to be fiscally neutral for the state and central government's finances.
While the panel prefers a single unified rate, it also laid out a rate structure to give flexibility to policy choices. One of the options is to impose a lower 12% rate on essential goods, 40% on luxury items (tobacco, luxury cars etc.) and the remaining taxed at 17-18%. All services could be pegged at the standard 17- 18% level. It was also proposed to scrap the additional 1% inter-state tax for manufacturing states. The decision on the exact rate and revenue-sharing would be left to the GST council which will be formed after the constitutional amendments are passed.
The committee estimates minimal inflationary and fiscal implications from this revenue neutral rate. But intermittent price pressures are likely as services taxes are raised from the current 14.5% to 17-18%, while product taxes are fine-tuned (few lowered). To compensate for any fiscal pressure on states, the revenue compensation period of five years is under consideration. Passage of the GST bill will be a boost to revive the Make in India policy and improve the ease of doing business by subsuming plethora of taxes/ exemptions in the system. On growth, a Thirteenth Finance Commission taskforce estimated that the boost to growth could be in the range of 0.9-1.7% of GDP.
At this stage, these proposals are not binding. If these recommendations are accepted, these will built into the GST bill that is pending in the upper house. Prima facie, the proposals fulfil some of the key objections raised by the opposition parties, increasing the odds that the GST bill will pass through this parliament sitting.
"Considering the logistical and technological architecture that needs to be put in place before this unified rate becomes effective, we see the risk that the Apr16 implementation deadline will be missed and delayed to second half of 2016", notes DBS Group Research.


ICC Rules Duterte Fit to Stand Trial in Drug War Case
Mexico Bars Dual Citizens From Presidential Races Starting in 2028
Crypto Market Selloff Wipes Out $100B as Bitcoin Falls Below $83K
Oil Prices Rise as Gulf Hurricane and Middle East Supply Risks Mount
US Suspends Microsoft, Adobe From Green Card Program
Indian Stocks Fall as RBI Hikes Rates to 5.50%
Tsai Warns of China’s Sustained Pressure on Taiwan
Gold Prices Fall as Stronger Dollar Weighs on Bullion
Oil Prices Rise as Hormuz Attacks Fuel Supply Fears
UK House Prices Flat in September as Mortgage Rates Weigh
Marco Rubio Warns Russia-Ukraine War Could Spark Wider Conflict
Trump Rallies in Texas as Republicans Face Tight Midterm Races
Iran Tanker Attacks Surge as Hormuz Oil Flows Near Prewar Levels
European Stocks Fall as Oil Rises Ahead of Fed Minutes
Russia Targets Danish Ukraine Suppliers in Sabotage Campaign 



