Malaysia’s former prime minister Najib Razak is set to learn on Monday whether he can serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest, a decision that could have major political and legal implications for the country. The ruling comes as part of two closely watched court decisions this week that will test Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s commitment to fighting corruption amid lingering controversies surrounding the 1MDB scandal.
Najib has been incarcerated since 2022 after being convicted of corruption and money laundering linked to 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), the state investment fund he co-founded in 2009. Originally sentenced to 12 years in prison, his term was reduced by half last year following a decision by a pardons board chaired by Malaysia’s former king. However, Najib claims that the monarch also issued an “addendum order” allowing him to serve his remaining sentence at home.
For months, government officials denied the existence of such a document. More recently, the former king’s office and a federal lawyer confirmed that the addendum order had indeed been issued, prompting Najib to seek a court order compelling the government to acknowledge and enforce it. The Kuala Lumpur High Court is expected to rule on this request on Monday.
Just days later, on December 26, the same court will deliver its verdict in the largest remaining 1MDB trial involving Najib. He faces four additional corruption charges and 21 counts of money laundering related to the alleged illegal transfer of about 2.2 billion ringgit from 1MDB. If convicted, Najib could face up to 20 years in prison for each charge, along with hefty financial penalties.
Analysts warn that any ruling favorable to Najib could provoke public backlash, especially among supporters of Anwar, who rose to power in 2022 on an anti-corruption platform. Critics have already questioned Anwar’s reform agenda after prosecutors dropped several cases involving Najib and recently abandoned an appeal in a graft case against Najib’s wife, Rosmah Mansor.
Najib maintains his innocence, arguing he was misled by fugitive financier Jho Low and other officials. As the court decisions approach, the outcome is widely seen as a critical test of Malaysia’s judiciary, prosecution, and political will to uphold accountability in one of the country’s biggest corruption scandals.


Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic
NATO to Discuss Strengthening Greenland Security Amid Arctic Tensions
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 



