Rural counties in California and Illinois are reigniting their push to secede from their respective states, aiming to distance themselves from what they perceive as liberal-dominated city policies. This movement, which has simmered for years, gained renewed momentum following Donald Trump's recent election victory, with advocates arguing that their interests are systematically overlooked by urban-centric governments.
The push for secession stems from a desire to create new states that reflect the political, cultural, and economic values of rural residents. In California, proponents advocate for the creation of "Jefferson State," which would consist of several northern counties. Meanwhile, in Illinois, rural counties are pushing to separate Chicago from the rest of the state, citing the city’s outsized influence over state politics.
A Longstanding Divide
The secessionist movement in these states highlights the growing rural-urban divide in American politics. Rural residents in California and Illinois have long voiced frustration with policies implemented by state governments, including tax regulations, gun control laws, and environmental mandates, which they say disproportionately burden rural communities.
Supporters of the movements argue that the states' metropolitan areas—particularly Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago—dominate political decisions, leaving rural populations with little say in their governance. "These urban centers don’t represent us," said one advocate for Jefferson State, reflecting the sentiment among many rural voters.
Trump's Victory Spurs Action
Donald Trump’s recent win has emboldened these secessionist movements, with organizers claiming his victory represents a mandate for rural America to reclaim its political voice. Advocates argue that the election results demonstrate the need for rural communities to break free from liberal-run cities that do not align with their values.
In Illinois, Trump won decisively in rural counties, while Chicago overwhelmingly supported his opponent. Similarly, in California, rural areas leaned heavily Republican, despite the state as a whole voting Democratic. These results, advocates say, underscore the political chasm between urban and rural areas.
Challenges to Secession
While the idea of secession has gained traction in some rural circles, achieving it would require clearing significant legal and political hurdles. Both state and federal governments would need to approve any proposal to create new states, a process that many experts say is highly unlikely.
Critics of the movement argue that secession would create economic instability and logistical challenges for both the new states and the states they leave behind. They also point out that rural areas often rely on tax revenues generated by urban centers, raising questions about the financial viability of proposed states like Jefferson.
Online Reactions
The renewed push for secession has sparked heated debate online, with social media users sharing a wide range of opinions:
- @CityLivingNow: "Rural counties don’t realize how much they rely on urban economies. This is short-sighted at best."
- @CountryStrong2024: "We’re tired of being ignored by city elites. Time for rural America to take control!"
- @PolicyWonks: "Creating new states is not the solution. It’s just adding more division to an already fractured nation."
- @FarmLifeMatters: "Jefferson State sounds great! Let rural voices finally be heard without city interference."
- @UrbanRealityCheck: "Who’s going to fund these new states? Spoiler: It’s not happening without urban dollars."
- @RedStateRising: "This is the movement America needs. Cities have controlled us for too long!"
What’s Next?
As the movement gains traction, proponents are rallying for greater support from local communities and political leaders. Public meetings and petitions have been organized in both states, with advocates calling on their rural neighbors to push for change.
While the path to secession remains steep, the movement underscores the persistent rural-urban divide in American politics, a divide that Trump’s victory appears to have widened further.


Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran




