NEW YORK, Dec. 02, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of VimpelCom Ltd. (NASDAQ:VIP) securities during the period from June 30, 2011 through November 2, 2015 inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important January 4, 2016 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for VimpelCom investors under the federal securities laws.
To join the VimpelCom class action, go to the firm’s website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-774.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action.
NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.
According to the lawsuit, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) VimpelCom had paid tens of millions of dollars to a company controlled by Gulnara Karimova (“Karimova”), daughter of the president of Uzbekistan; (ii) the payments to Karimova were unlawful bribes intended to secure VimpelCom’s access to Uzbekistan’s telecommunications market; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about VimpelCom’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
On November 3, 2015, pre-market, VimpelCom announced that it had set aside $900 million for litigation costs in connection with U.S. and Dutch investigations into the Company’s operations in Uzbekistan. On this news, VimpelCom’s ADRs fell $0.17, or 4.63%, to close at $3.50 on November 3, 2015.
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 4, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to the firm’s website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-774.html for more information. You may also contact Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected].
Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. Kevin Chan, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.rosenlegal.com


Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Nvidia Nears $20 Billion OpenAI Investment as AI Funding Race Intensifies
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 



