SHINGLE SPRINGS, Calif., Sept. 15, 2017 -- Today, the California Court of Appeal for the Third District issued a long-awaited opinion in the case of Sharp Image Gaming v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, giving a complete victory to the Tribe in litigation that spanned a decade. From the time the case was filed in El Dorado Superior Court in 2007, the Tribe has maintained it had no contractual obligation to Sharp Image Gaming for the company’s failed attempt to build a casino in the 1990s, and the state court should have immediately dismissed the case. Offering a complete vindication of the Tribe’s legal arguments, the Court of Appeal ruled that the case should never have proceeded to trial and that the Tribe owed Sharp Image nothing.
“I always believed the Tribe was in the right,” said Nicholas Fonseca, Chairman of the federally recognized Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, whose reservation is in El Dorado County, and which owns and operates the Red Hawk Casino. “I’m glad the Tribe had the perseverance to stay the course. This is a victory for all tribes in California.”
At trial, Sharp Image sought approximately $300 million in damages on two contracts, but the jury rejected that claim, awarding instead just under $30 million. However, by the time the matter was decided by the Court of Appeal, the claimed damages amounted to approximately $49 million, representing the award plus interest, accrued with the passage of time.
In ruling for the Tribe, the Court of Appeal found that the contracts were illegal, and thus unenforceable, under federal law. Specifically, the Court ruled that one contract was a "management" contract under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and the second was interrelated and so "collateral" to the management contract. Because neither was approved by the federal agency charged with regulating Indian gaming, as the federal law requires, neither could be enforced by Sharp Image. The Tribe had raised this defense at the outset of the litigation, but the trial court declined to reach the issue, which the Court of Appeal found to be erroneous.
In addition to ruling for the Tribe on the merits, and reversing the jury award to Sharp Image, the Court of Appeal ordered Sharp Image to reimburse the Tribe for the costs it incurred to pursue the appeal.
The opinion will be published as citable California appellate precedent, and the Tribe will next consider whether to pursue recovery of the legal fees it incurred against Sharp Image.
-Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians-
MEDIA CONTACT
Kim Stoll, Director of Public Relations
Office: (530) 387-4183 • Mobile: (775) 232-4976


TSMC Japan's Second Fab to Produce 3nm Chips by 2028
Nike Beats Q3 Estimates but China Weakness and Margin Pressure Weigh on Outlook
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure
Cathay Pacific Holds Firm on Flight Capacity Amid Middle East Conflict and Rising Fuel Costs
SpaceX Eyes Historic IPO at $1.75 Trillion Valuation
Microsoft's $10 Billion Japan Investment: AI Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty Push
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute
Norma Group Posts Revenue Decline in 2025, Eyes Modest Recovery in 2026
Apple Turns 50: From Garage Startup to AI Crossroads
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports
Fonterra Admits Anchor Butter "Grass-Fed" Label Misled Consumers After Greenpeace Lawsuit
OpenAI Executive Shake-Up Ahead of Anticipated 2026 IPO
LG Electronics Posts Record Q1 Revenue Amid Strong Demand and Cost Improvements
UPS and Teamsters Reach Agreement to Limit Driver Severance Program 



