CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality 
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility 
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links 
Australian Household Spending Dips in December as RBA Tightens Policy 
U.S. Condemns South Africa’s Expulsion of Israeli Diplomat Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions 
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Gold and Silver Prices Rebound After Volatile Week Triggered by Fed Nomination 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Trump Administration Appeals Court Order to Release Hudson Tunnel Project Funding 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
