US-Iran Strikes Escalate as Strait of Hormuz Crisis Pushes Oil Prices Higher 
Supreme Court Backs Lisa Cook, Defends Federal Reserve Independence Against Trump Firing Attempt 
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Gautam Adani Bribery Case, Citing Foreign Scope 
How to create a thriving forest, not box-checking ‘tree cover’ 
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property 
Judge Orders $5.8 Million Payment to E. Jean Carroll After Trump Loses Appeal Bid 
How is Antarctica melting, exactly? Crucial details are beginning to come into focus 
ICC Says Darfur War Crimes Probe Reaches Breakthrough in Sudan Investigation 
How ongoing deforestation is rooted in colonialism and its management practices 
Brazil Court Bars Flavio Bolsonaro From Visiting Jair Bolsonaro Ahead of Election 
Fertile land for growing vegetables is at risk — but a scientific discovery could turn the tide 
DOJ Grand Jury Investigates UAW President Shawn Fain Ahead of Union Election 
Samsung to Launch First Yongin Chip Plant by 2029 as South Korea Speeds Up Semiconductor Hub 
SK Hynix Shares Drop After Strong Nasdaq Debut Despite $26 Billion ADR Listing 
Rio Tinto Reports Strong Q2 Iron Ore Sales, Maintains 2026 Production Outlook 
Extreme heat, flooding, wildfires – Colorado’s formerly incarcerated people on the hazards they faced behind bars 
The Seoul Central District Court has favored Hyundai against 173 Kona EV owners seeking compensation for their vehicles' deteriorating reputation and devaluation due to fires caused by battery issues.
Hyundai voluntarily recalled around 25,000 Kona EV units in October 2020 to update the Battery Management System and replace the batteries if abnormalities were found, like an excessive voltage gap between cells and oscillating temperatures.
But the car owners found the recall insufficient and sued Hyundai for physical and mental damages in November 2020.
In February 2021, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport declared that some high-voltage batteries produced by the Nanjing, China, facility of LG Energy Solution Ltd. had flaws.
