UN's 'global stocktake' on climate is offering a sober emissions reckoning − but there are also signs of progress
Bletchley declaration: international agreement on AI safety is a good start, but ordinary people need a say – not just elites
World Bank suspension of Uganda funds over anti-homosexuality law: what this says about the struggle over funds and sovereignty
Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted of fraud following the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Here's what investors need to know
Sotheby's may be liable for missing diamonds worth $4 million, says court
A state appellate court ruled Sotheby's may be liable for $4 million of disappeared diamonds after it allegedly released them to a "stranger."
After M&L Financial had given the diamonds to Sotheby's for appraisal in April 2019 and was considering a future consignment.
The diamonds had been the property of Jadelle Jewelry and Diamonds of Beverly Hills, owned by Jona Rechnitz, who gave the stones to M&L because he owed the firm a "substantial debt."
While Sotheby's possessed the diamonds, someone claiming to be an agent of Jadelle showed up at Sotheby's to pick up the jewels.
Sotheby's claimed that Rechnitz had alerted it that the agent was coming.
In 2020, M&L filed a lawsuit against Sotheby's, claiming that the jewels shouldn't have been given to a Jadelle representative.
Initially, a lower court determined that Sotheby's was right to give the items to Jadelle's agent since Jadelle was mentioned on the contract as a co-consignor alongside M&L Financial.
But the Court of Appeals in the State of California as Bruning, the Sotheby's executive, wrote "Jadelle Jewelry + M&L Financial Inc." in the space "Consignor Name."
M&L claimed that after vocally objecting to the incorrect wording and insisting that only the financial business be included, it still signed the agreement. Sotheby's denies that this matter was ever brought up.
Will AI kill our creativity? It could – if we don’t start to value and protect the traits that make us human