Even though it has been making a lot of effort to show the world that it is at least doing a few things about fake news and hate speech, Facebook has been notorious for leaving its users alone whenever they put up hateful materials on its platform. A court in Austria is just not having any of this as it just ruled that the social network needs to remove hate speech.
The court’s decision started with the kerfuffle involving a fake Facebook account posting offensive comments with regards to one of the country’s leaders, Tech Crunch reports. The Green Party of Austria brought the case to the court because of how its leader, Eva Glawischnig was being attacked on the social media site.
According to the party’s claims, it already brought the matter to Facebook’s attention on numerous occasions involving multiple posts, but the social network simply refused to take them down. Seeing no other recourse, the party turned to the Commercial Court of Vienna, which granted a preliminary injunction for Facebook to take down the hateful posts, as classified under Austrian law.
The social network tried to file an appeal, which turned out to be a mistake since the court only added more stipulations to the order, saying that verbatim re-posts of the hate speech need to be taken down along with the original. What’s more, instead of just implementing this order locally, Facebook is being forced to do so globally.
Mark Zuckerberg and his company’s troubles are only starting as well. While there was no mention from the court to indicate that Facebook needs to remove similarly offensive posts, the country’s Green Party has no such reservations.
As Reuters reports, the party intends to take the matter to the nation’s highest court in order to force the social media company to weed out hate speech of the same vein. If successful, Facebook will need to comply or face consequences such as being blocked or having its presence significantly reduced in the country.


SoftBank Eyes $20 Billion Bond Sale to Refinance OpenAI Loan
US Weighs New Sanctions Against Brazil Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes
Bashar al-Assad Sentenced to Death by Syrian Court
Prince Harry Faces Potential Multi-Million-Pound Legal Bill in Daily Mail Case
DOJ Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund Ahead of Todd Blanche Senate Confirmation Vote
Luxshare Shares Rise as First-Half Profit Jumps 18%
Meta, U.S. States Discuss Settlement in Teen Addiction Trial
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight
Nvidia Reportedly Eyes $13 Billion Hugging Face Acquisition
UN Chief Raises Concern Over US Sanctions on ICC Officials
New Zealand Moves to Ban Social Media for Children Under 16
Google Changes EU Spam Policy Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Sun Pharma Wins U.S. Appeal in Pfizer Lipitor Antitrust Case
Nvidia Pauses AI Cloud Financing Deals Amid Antitrust Concerns
U.S. Disrupts China-Linked Hacking Campaign Targeting Government Agencies
TikTok, DOJ Reach $400 Million Children’s Privacy Settlement
Judge Rejects Minnesota Bid to Force ICE Agent Extradition 



