Barclays reported stronger-than-expected first-half earnings on Tuesday, driven by robust investment banking performance, higher equities trading revenue, and increased dealmaking activity. Despite the earnings beat, the British lender's shares fell more than 4% in London trading as investors focused on rising costs and mixed divisional performance.
The bank posted first-half pre-tax profit of £6.1 billion, exceeding analysts' consensus estimate of approximately £5.94 billion. Barclays also announced a £1 billion share buyback, surpassing market expectations of £831 million, while raising its full-year income guidance to £31.5 billion from £31 billion.
Barclays' investment banking division remained a key growth engine, generating £4 billion in second-quarter income, ahead of analyst forecasts of £3.7 billion. Equities trading revenue surged 45% year-over-year, reflecting continued market volatility and strong client activity. However, the increase trailed the average 69% equities revenue growth reported by major Wall Street banks during the same period.
The lender also benefited from a strong performance in its U.S. Consumer Bank, where income jumped 38%. The growth was supported by a roughly £225 million gain from the sale of its American Airlines co-branded credit card portfolio and the acquisition of Best Egg.
Operating expenses increased due to business expansion, inflation, and ongoing investments, although Barclays said about £200 million in cost efficiency savings during the second quarter helped offset part of the rise.
Barclays reported a 14.8% return on tangible equity (RoTE) for the first half and a 14.3% CET1 capital ratio. The bank reaffirmed its expectation of delivering a full-year 2026 RoTE above 12%, maintaining a CET1 ratio between 13% and 14%, while reiterating plans to return at least £10 billion to shareholders between 2024 and 2026.
Analysts at Jefferies described the results as a "slightly messy" set of numbers, citing strong investment banking revenue but weaker performance in other areas and the likelihood of higher second-half costs. Morgan Stanley also suggested the market had largely anticipated the investment banking strength, making profit-taking after the results a likely reason behind the stock's decline.
