Japan Considers Extra Budget Aid Amid Rising Fuel and Utility Costs 
Trump, Xi Begin High-Stakes China Summit Focused on Trade, Taiwan and Global Tensions 
Apple Eyes U.S. Formula 1 Broadcast Rights in Major Sports Streaming Push 
Alphabet Raises Record $3.6 Billion in Yen Bonds to Support AI Expansion 
Judge Orders Release of Family After Longest ICE Detention Under Trump Administration 
US Stock Futures Slip as Iran Tensions and Hot Inflation Data Pressure Wall Street 
FTC Antitrust Probe Targets Arm Holdings Over Chip Licensing Practices 
Asia-Pacific Banks Brace for Rising Credit Risks Amid Iran Conflict 
Trump's Transgender Sports Ban Faces Enforcement Challenges 
Gold Prices Hold Steady as Investors Monitor U.S.-Iran Tensions and Trump-Xi Summit 
Trump Administration Seeks Court Pause to Reinstate 10% Global Tariffs 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Nidec Shares Plunge After Quality Inspection Misconduct Allegations 
OpenAI Finds No Evidence of User Data Breach in TanStack npm Supply-Chain Attack 
Oil Prices Hold Above $100 as Trump-Xi Meeting and Iran Conflict Keep Markets on Edge 
DOJ May Drop Gautam Adani Fraud Charges Amid $10 Billion U.S. Investment Plan 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
