Judge Rejects Minnesota Bid to Force ICE Agent Extradition 
Volkswagen Job Cuts Put Lower Saxony Leader Under Political Pressure 
TSMC August Revenue Jumps 53% on AI Chip Demand 
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal 
Nvidia-Groq AI Chip Deal Faces U.S. Antitrust Probe 
Novartis M&A Strategy Faces Investor Scrutiny After Drug Setbacks 
29 US states are suing Meta. What might it mean for the rest of the world? 
FBI Faces Historic Security Challenge Ahead of 2026 FIFA World Cup 
US Treasury Yields Near 5% as Oil Fuels Inflation Fears 
Longsys Raises $903 Million in Hong Kong IPO as Shares Debut Flat 
FIFA Faces Investigation Over 2026 World Cup Ticket Pricing and Seat Allocation Issues 
Bashar al-Assad Sentenced to Death by Syrian Court 
California Seeks Paramount Divestitures in Warner Bros. Merger 
Ecuador Court Convicts Ex-President Lenin Moreno in Bribery Case 
TikTok, DOJ Reach $400 Million Children’s Privacy Settlement 
JD Vance to Lead U.S. Presidential Delegation at Milano Cortina Winter Olympics Opening Ceremony 
Prince Harry Faces Potential Multi-Million-Pound Legal Bill in Daily Mail Case 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
