Obayashi to Acquire Multiplex in $526M Expansion Deal 
Trump Team Rejects BBC Financial Data Request in $10B Lawsuit 
Asian Currencies Stabilize as Dollar Holds Near Two-Month High After Fed Hawkish Signal 
BHP Shares Fall as Jansen Potash Project Costs Surge 
Trump Booed at Club World Cup Final, Praises Pele as Soccer’s GOAT 
Asian Stocks Surge as Oil Prices Fall and Strong US Dollar Weighs on Markets 
Trump Lawyers Face Scrutiny After Missing Deadline in $10 Billion BBC Defamation Lawsuit 
TD Bank Expands Employee Monitoring Software to Boost Productivity Amid Privacy Concerns 
Europe EV Demand Surges as Fuel Prices Rise Amid Iran Conflict 
U.S. Reinstates Sanctions on U.N. Expert Francesca Albanese Amid Legal Battle 
Asian Stocks Rally as Japan and South Korea Reach Record Highs on US-Iran Peace Deal 
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh Signals Policy Overhaul as Hawkish Rate Outlook Rattles Markets 
Italy’s Economy Outpaces Eurozone Peers as Investment Spending Fuels Growth 
Trump Administration Delays DeepSeek and CXMT Trade Blacklist Designations Amid U.S.-China Tensions 
US Appeals Court Allows Trump Military Enlistment Ban on Transgender Recruits, Protects Current Service Members 
Trump Questions USMCA Renewal as Trade Talks Continue 
G7 Explores AI Access Deal With U.S. Amid Anthropic Restrictions 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
