Oil Prices Surge Amid Middle East Tensions as Houthi Attacks Escalate Conflict 
9 Tips for Avoiding Tax Season Cyber Scams 
Bank of Japan Signals Rate Flexibility Amid Yen Volatility 
Trump Booed at Club World Cup Final, Praises Pele as Soccer’s GOAT 
Jerome Powell May Stay on Fed Board Amid Criminal Investigation, Court Documents Reveal 
Henkel in Advanced Talks to Acquire Olaplex at $2 Per Share 
Trump Threatens Stadium Deal Over Washington Commanders Name 
Trump Plans New Executive Order to Address Rising NIL Costs in College Sports 
Lynas Rare Earths Signs Vietnam Deal with LS Eco Energy to Boost Magnet Metal Production 
FEMA Reinstates $1 Billion Disaster Prevention Grant Program After Court Order 
Asian Stocks Rebound as Trump Delays Iran Strike Deadline 
Bessent: Global Oil Market Well Supplied as U.S. Eyes Hormuz Navigation Control 
Novartis to Acquire Biotech Firm Excellergy in $2 Billion Deal 
NASDAQ Tech Selloff: Correction or Collapse? What Analysts Are Saying 
Cybersecurity Stocks Tumble After Anthropic's Claude Mythos AI Leak Sparks Market Fears 
Australia’s major sports codes are considered not-for-profits – is it time for them to pay up? 
Native American Groups Slam Trump’s Call to Restore Redskins Name 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
