TSMC Honors Japanese Chip Equipment Makers With 2025 Supplier Awards 
From Messi to Mika Häkkinen: how top athletes can slow down time 
Winter Storm Devin Triggers Massive Flight Cancellations and Travel Disruptions Across the U.S. 
Najib Razak Jailed 15 More Years in Landmark 1MDB Verdict With Major Political Impact 
Why Manchester City offered Erling Haaland the longest contract in Premier League history 
DOJ Releases New Epstein Files Detailing Alleged Trump Flights on Private Jet 
Trump Threatens Stadium Deal Over Washington Commanders Name 
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training 
Australia’s major sports codes are considered not-for-profits – is it time for them to pay up? 
Hyundai Recalls Over 51,000 Vehicles in the U.S. Due to Fire Risk From Trailer Wiring Issue 
Trump to Host UFC Event at White House on His 80th Birthday 
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly Cut Obesity Drug Prices in China, Boosting Access to Wegovy and Mounjaro 
China LNG Imports Rise in December as Long-Term Contracts Drive Growth 
Applied Digital Stock Rises on AI Cloud Spinoff Plan and ChronoScale Launch 
Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting Big-Money College Athlete Payouts 
California DMV Proposes New Safety Rules for Autonomous Vehicles After Waymo Incidents 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
