California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused TikTok of suppressing content critical of President Donald Trump, prompting a state-level review into the platform’s content moderation practices to determine whether they violate California law. The announcement, made Monday, adds a new political dimension to TikTok’s ongoing scrutiny in the United States following its recent restructuring deal aimed at avoiding a nationwide ban.
According to a statement from Newsom’s office shared on X, reports have emerged alleging that TikTok limited the reach of posts critical of President Trump after the platform was sold to a Trump-aligned business group. The governor’s office said it had independently confirmed instances of such suppression, though no specific examples were disclosed. As a result, Newsom has called on the California Department of Justice to review the matter and assess potential legal violations under state law.
The allegations come shortly after TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, finalized a deal creating a new entity, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. The agreement establishes a majority U.S.-owned structure designed to safeguard American user data and address long-standing national security and privacy concerns raised by U.S. officials under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Under the deal, American and global investors hold 80.1% of the joint venture, while ByteDance retains a 19.9% stake.
Three managing investors—Oracle, private equity firm Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi-based investment company MGX—each own 15% of the venture. A White House official confirmed that both the U.S. and Chinese governments approved the arrangement, which President Trump publicly praised.
Trump, who has more than 16 million followers on TikTok, has credited the app with helping him secure victory in the 2024 presidential election, highlighting its influence among American voters. Newsom, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, have a long history of political rivalry, which further amplifies the significance of the governor’s claims.
Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded to requests for comment. As the California Department of Justice begins its review, the outcome could have major implications for TikTok’s operations, content moderation policies, and its relationship with U.S. regulators amid an already complex political and regulatory environment.


Apple Turns 50: From Garage Startup to AI Crossroads
Microsoft's $10 Billion Japan Investment: AI Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty Push
Trump Expands Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals and Metals One Year After Liberation Day
SpaceX Eyes Historic IPO at $1.75 Trillion Valuation
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition
Europe's Aviation Sector on Track to Meet 2025 Green Fuel Mandate
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure
Luxury Car Sales in the Middle East Take a Hit Amid Iran War
Microsoft Eyes $7B Texas Energy Deal to Power AI Data Centers
Reflection AI Eyes $25 Billion Valuation in Massive $2.5 Billion Funding Round
UN Confirms Sexual Exploitation Allegations Against Haiti Security Force Members
Trump Threatens Expanded Military Strikes on Iran, Targeting Bridges and Power Plants
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
TSMC Japan's Second Fab to Produce 3nm Chips by 2028
Congress Eyes Two-Bill Strategy to Resolve DHS Funding Crisis
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports
Australia's Social Media Ban for Under-16s Sparks Global Movement 



