California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused TikTok of suppressing content critical of President Donald Trump, prompting a state-level review into the platform’s content moderation practices to determine whether they violate California law. The announcement, made Monday, adds a new political dimension to TikTok’s ongoing scrutiny in the United States following its recent restructuring deal aimed at avoiding a nationwide ban.
According to a statement from Newsom’s office shared on X, reports have emerged alleging that TikTok limited the reach of posts critical of President Trump after the platform was sold to a Trump-aligned business group. The governor’s office said it had independently confirmed instances of such suppression, though no specific examples were disclosed. As a result, Newsom has called on the California Department of Justice to review the matter and assess potential legal violations under state law.
The allegations come shortly after TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, finalized a deal creating a new entity, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. The agreement establishes a majority U.S.-owned structure designed to safeguard American user data and address long-standing national security and privacy concerns raised by U.S. officials under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Under the deal, American and global investors hold 80.1% of the joint venture, while ByteDance retains a 19.9% stake.
Three managing investors—Oracle, private equity firm Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi-based investment company MGX—each own 15% of the venture. A White House official confirmed that both the U.S. and Chinese governments approved the arrangement, which President Trump publicly praised.
Trump, who has more than 16 million followers on TikTok, has credited the app with helping him secure victory in the 2024 presidential election, highlighting its influence among American voters. Newsom, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, have a long history of political rivalry, which further amplifies the significance of the governor’s claims.
Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded to requests for comment. As the California Department of Justice begins its review, the outcome could have major implications for TikTok’s operations, content moderation policies, and its relationship with U.S. regulators amid an already complex political and regulatory environment.


Qantas Shares Climb as Long-Haul Pilot Deal Eases Strike Concerns
SoftBank Q1 Profit Beats Forecast as Intel Rally and OpenAI Investments Boost Returns
US Expands Social Media Vetting to Foreign Journalists Seeking Visas
Iran-Oman Near Strait of Hormuz Deal as Shipping Tensions Persist
Apple Restores Telegram to App Store After Content Policy Violation
Berkshire Hathaway Cash Falls as Abel Boosts Stock Buybacks
Palantir Stock Soars as AI Demand Drives Strong Q2 Earnings and Higher 2026 Outlook
North Korea May Deploy 120 Missiles to Russia
Telegram Restored on Apple App Store After Temporary Removal
Senate Majority Leader John Thune Moves to Advance Crypto Clarity Act
UOB Q2 Net Profit Rises 10% as Wealth Management Growth Boosts Earnings
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico
SK Hynix, Samsung Lead Asian Chip Stock Selloff After Sandisk, Western Digital Outlook
Sony, TSMC Eye $6.3 Billion Japan Chip Venture for Next-Gen Image Sensors
AI Data Center Boom Faces New Risks as Public Backlash and Policy Scrutiny Grow
Daimler Truck Q2 Profit Falls 18%, 2026 Outlook Raised 



