California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused TikTok of suppressing content critical of President Donald Trump, prompting a state-level review into the platform’s content moderation practices to determine whether they violate California law. The announcement, made Monday, adds a new political dimension to TikTok’s ongoing scrutiny in the United States following its recent restructuring deal aimed at avoiding a nationwide ban.
According to a statement from Newsom’s office shared on X, reports have emerged alleging that TikTok limited the reach of posts critical of President Trump after the platform was sold to a Trump-aligned business group. The governor’s office said it had independently confirmed instances of such suppression, though no specific examples were disclosed. As a result, Newsom has called on the California Department of Justice to review the matter and assess potential legal violations under state law.
The allegations come shortly after TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, finalized a deal creating a new entity, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. The agreement establishes a majority U.S.-owned structure designed to safeguard American user data and address long-standing national security and privacy concerns raised by U.S. officials under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Under the deal, American and global investors hold 80.1% of the joint venture, while ByteDance retains a 19.9% stake.
Three managing investors—Oracle, private equity firm Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi-based investment company MGX—each own 15% of the venture. A White House official confirmed that both the U.S. and Chinese governments approved the arrangement, which President Trump publicly praised.
Trump, who has more than 16 million followers on TikTok, has credited the app with helping him secure victory in the 2024 presidential election, highlighting its influence among American voters. Newsom, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, have a long history of political rivalry, which further amplifies the significance of the governor’s claims.
Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded to requests for comment. As the California Department of Justice begins its review, the outcome could have major implications for TikTok’s operations, content moderation policies, and its relationship with U.S. regulators amid an already complex political and regulatory environment.


Meta Ties Executive Pay to Aggressive Stock Price Targets in Major Retention Push
Makemation: a Nollywood movie that shows AI in action in Africa
SpaceX IPO Filing Expected This Week as Valuation Could Surpass $75 Billion
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports
MATCH Act Targets ASML and Chinese Chipmakers in New U.S. Export Crackdown
Trump Threatens Expanded Military Strikes on Iran, Targeting Bridges and Power Plants
Jefferies Upgrades Sodexo to Buy With €55 Target After Historic CEO Appointment
Microsoft's $10 Billion Japan Investment: AI Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty Push
Federal Judge Blocks Pentagon's Blacklisting of AI Company Anthropic
California's AI Executive Order Pushes Responsible Tech Use in State Contracts
Russia Unleashes Drone Barrage on Kharkiv, Injuring Child Among Victims
Trump Fires Attorney General Pam Bondi Over Epstein Files and Slow Prosecutions
Trump Defends U.S.-Israel War on Iran in Prime-Time Address as Public Support Wanes
Star Entertainment Secures $390M Refinancing Deal to Stabilize Operations
Federal Judge Rules CBP Violated Warrantless Arrest Order During Sacramento Immigration Sweep
Fonterra Admits Anchor Butter "Grass-Fed" Label Misled Consumers After Greenpeace Lawsuit
Google's TurboQuant Algorithm Sends Memory Chip Stocks Tumbling 



