California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused TikTok of suppressing content critical of President Donald Trump, prompting a state-level review into the platform’s content moderation practices to determine whether they violate California law. The announcement, made Monday, adds a new political dimension to TikTok’s ongoing scrutiny in the United States following its recent restructuring deal aimed at avoiding a nationwide ban.
According to a statement from Newsom’s office shared on X, reports have emerged alleging that TikTok limited the reach of posts critical of President Trump after the platform was sold to a Trump-aligned business group. The governor’s office said it had independently confirmed instances of such suppression, though no specific examples were disclosed. As a result, Newsom has called on the California Department of Justice to review the matter and assess potential legal violations under state law.
The allegations come shortly after TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, finalized a deal creating a new entity, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. The agreement establishes a majority U.S.-owned structure designed to safeguard American user data and address long-standing national security and privacy concerns raised by U.S. officials under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Under the deal, American and global investors hold 80.1% of the joint venture, while ByteDance retains a 19.9% stake.
Three managing investors—Oracle, private equity firm Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi-based investment company MGX—each own 15% of the venture. A White House official confirmed that both the U.S. and Chinese governments approved the arrangement, which President Trump publicly praised.
Trump, who has more than 16 million followers on TikTok, has credited the app with helping him secure victory in the 2024 presidential election, highlighting its influence among American voters. Newsom, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, have a long history of political rivalry, which further amplifies the significance of the governor’s claims.
Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded to requests for comment. As the California Department of Justice begins its review, the outcome could have major implications for TikTok’s operations, content moderation policies, and its relationship with U.S. regulators amid an already complex political and regulatory environment.


Universal Music Group Rejects Pershing Square Takeover Proposal
DOJ Investigates Group Linked to Reid Hoffman Over E. Jean Carroll Lawsuit Funding
JPMorgan Sees Biotech Sector at Turning Point, Upgrades Top Pharma Stocks
Elon Musk Explores Possible Tesla-SpaceX Merger Amid Growing AI Investments
SpaceX Delays Starship V3 Launch Ahead of Potential Record IPO
US Imposes Fresh Iran Oil Sanctions Despite Progress on Ceasefire Talks
Samsung Union Dispute Escalates Over Semiconductor Bonus Vote
US Quantum Stocks Surge After $2 Billion Government Investment
Marvell Stock Rises After Record Q1 FY2027 Earnings Fueled by AI Demand
Autodesk Beats Q1 Estimates, Acquires MaintainX for $3.6 Billion
Snowflake Stock Soars 30% After Q1 Earnings Beat and Major AWS AI Partnership
Kentucky School District Secures $27 Million in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Settlements
SK Hynix Joins $1 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Fuels Stock Surge
SQM Q1 Profit More Than Doubles as Lithium Prices Surge
Macquarie Names Five Taiwan AI Stocks Set to Benefit From Data Center Growth in 2026
Netanyahu Gaza Expansion Plan Sparks Hamas Condemnation and International Concern
US Launches New Trade Investigation Into Vietnam Over Intellectual Property Concerns 



