One in five Australian government employees, in a Queensland University of Technology study of over 600, are experiencing or observing workplace cyberbullying.
As opposed to the traditional workplace bullying definition, which involves persistent face-to-face harassment between a bully and their target(s), workplace cyberbullying is defined by the ability of abusive content to go viral on the internet or work intranet. It is defined as more intense because the content can be rapidly disseminated, hard to remove, follows people from work to home and can sometimes be anonymous.
Public servants in the study reported cyberbullying through work related phone calls and email, text messaging and instant message services.
Over half of the cyberbullying was in the form of micromanagement, inconsistent workloads and persistent criticism of a person and their work. Slander, social isolation and insinuations about a person’s mental health occurred over in 18.8% of cases.
Public servants reported being increasingly stressed about perpetrators' ability to use technology to mass broadcast defamatory comments or images quickly and publicly, without the target being able to easily defend themselves.
The findings are concerning as public servants comprise nearly 2 million employees out of Australia’s total workforce of nearly 12 million workers.
The research shows that employers are struggling to meet their duty of care obligations within the Work Health Safety Act 2011 to detect and manage pyscho-social hazards, such as face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying.
The study also suggests that a specific federal anti-cyberbullying intervention and prevention law, followed by specific workplace strategies, need to be developed for public sector employees and the wider Australian labour force.
At the moment government employees are offered anti-bullying advisory services from the Fair Work Commission. This enables the Commission to mediate on workers behalf to stop workplace bullying, or to raise an order to stop the behaviour.
This service is in addition to existing laws which mandate the development and enforcement of anti-bullying policies, training and education programs in each government agency.
Despite these measures, public servants in the QUT research had lowered expectations that their organisation’s anti-workplace bullying policies and procedures would quickly prevent or intervene on their behalf in workplace cyberbullying cases.
The costs of traditional face-to-face workplace bullying have been tallied before with the Australian Productivity Commission’s finding in 2010, which estimated the annual costs to Australian businesses of between $6 and $36 billion.
As indicated by the Productivity Commission’s report, there are direct costs from the time consumed in addressing and investigating allegations of bullying through formal grievance procedures. Other economic costs include treatments for victims, legal costs, income support and other government benefits.
In 2012, research found organisations were paying up to $24,000 for psychological injury claims.
Nearly half of participants (43.8%) in the cyberbullying study ranked their work performance and productivity as very negative to negative when they were being cyberbullied.
The QUT research was comprised of three studies: 24 confidential face-to-face interviews, a nation-wide anonymous online survey with 127 participants and a statistical online survey of 463 government employees. It is worth noting that research participants were volunteers, so the results could be potentially skewed towards participants who had either viewed or experienced workplace cyberbullying.
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.
Felicity Lawrence, PhD in workplace cyberbullying, Queensland University of Technology
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.



Chevron Sees Path to Boost Venezuela Oil Output by 50% After Trump Administration Talks
Trump Signals Willingness to Let New START Treaty Expire, Raising Global Nuclear Arms Concerns
Trump Pushes $100 Billion U.S. Oil Investment Plan for Venezuela After Maduro Seizure
Trump Administration Targets Mortgage-Backed Securities to Ease Housing Affordability Crunch
Trump Warns Iran as Nationwide Protests Intensify and Internet Is Shut Down
U.S. Weighs Direct Payments to Greenlanders Amid Renewed Push to Acquire Strategic Arctic Island
Honduran Opposition Lawmaker Injured Amid Post-Election Tensions
G7 Finance Ministers to Meet in Washington on Critical Minerals Supply Chains
U.S. Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s $10 Billion Federal Funding Freeze to Democratic States
U.S. Treasury Says It Can Handle Potential Tariff Refunds if Supreme Court Rules Against Trump
EU Set to Approve Historic Mercosur Trade Deal Amid Farmer Protests
Trump Signals Prolonged U.S. Control Over Venezuela, Dismisses Limits of International Law
Slovakia to Sign Nuclear Power Cooperation Agreement With the United States
Trump Says U.S. Must Control Greenland to Counter Russia and China
Myanmar Military-Run Election Draws Criticism as Voters Head to Polls Amid Ongoing Conflict
Canada and Brazil Call for Peaceful Venezuelan Transition After U.S. Military Raid
Trump Calls for 10% Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Starting 2026 



