NEW YORK, Feb. 12, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against OvaScience, Inc. (“OvaScience” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:OVAS) in the Suffolk County Superior Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Complaint alleges that officers and directors of OvaScience violated the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the Company’s January 8, 2015 Secondary Offering (the “Offering”) when they sold 2.3 million shares of common stock at an offering price of $50.00 per share
The Complaint alleges that the documents filed in connection with the Offering contained materially false and misleading statements and omissions, including that the approximately 150 patients that had received OvaScience’s AUGMENT procedure in 2014 did not achieve a pregnancy success rate that was significantly higher than the rate achieved without its AUGMENT procedure. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
The truth began to emerge on March 26 and 28, 2015, when the company reported results of IVF clinics utilizing the AUGMENT procedure, disclosing a 53% and a 25% success rate, respectively. These success rates were comparable to the success rate achieved for a woman using IVF without AUGMENT. On March 30, 3015, a Wainwright & Co. analyst questioned the Company’s AUGMENT data pregnancy rate calculation, stating that an alternative representation of the data would result in a 35% success rate rather than the 53% success rate declared by OvaScience. Then, on April 6, 2015, the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation published an article that challenged the reported 53% clinical pregnancy rate. The article suggested that the AUGMENT procedure data did not achieve a significant success rate of clinical pregnancies compared to previous rates achieved without the Company’s AUGMENT procedure. On September 28, 2015, OvaScience issued a press release announcing that it does not expect to meet the 2015 goal of 1,000 AUGMENT treatment cycles. On this news, the Company stock fell by $5.95 per share, or over 40%, to close at $8.57 per share on September 29, 2015. The stock has plummeted by over 77% since its Offering.
If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.


Toyota Global Vehicle Sales Decline in March Amid RAV4 Transition and Middle East Slowdown
Micro Systemation Reports Q1 Loss Amid Strategic Investments and Revenue Growth
Google Secures Pentagon AI Deal for Classified Projects
Spirit Airlines Gains Key Creditor Support for $500M Bailout Deal
Advantest Stock Falls on Weak Outlook Despite Strong AI-Driven Results
SMC Corp Stock Surges as Palliser Capital Pushes for Major Share Buyback
U.S. Demand for Alternative Satellite Providers Remains Strong Amid SpaceX Regulatory Push
Australia Targets Meta, Google, and TikTok With New News Payment Tax Proposal
Starbucks Raises 2026 Outlook as Turnaround Strategy Boosts Sales and Earnings
T-Mobile Beats Q1 Earnings Expectations on Strong Postpaid Growth
Seagate Stock Surges After Strong Q3 Earnings Beat and Bullish Outlook
Chinese Chip Stocks Surge on AI Boom and Domestic Tech Push
China’s Ultra-Cheap EV Boom: Why Electric Cars Cost Far Less Than in the U.S.
Pershing Square Raises $5 Billion in Landmark U.S. IPO and Share Placement
Lightelligence IPO Soars Over 400% in Hong Kong Debut Amid Rising AI Investment Demand
WuXi AppTec Stock Surges on Strong Q1 Earnings and CRDMO Demand Growth 



