Asian Stocks Slip as Tech Rout Deepens, Japan Steadies Ahead of Election 
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal 
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
South Africa Eyes ECB Repo Lines as Inflation Eases and Rate Cuts Loom 
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices 
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains 
Yen Slides as Japan Election Boosts Fiscal Stimulus Expectations 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
Dollar Near Two-Week High as Stock Rout, AI Concerns and Global Events Drive Market Volatility 
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Asian Currencies Stay Rangebound as Yen Firms on Intervention Talk 
UK Starting Salaries See Strongest Growth in 18 Months as Hiring Sentiment Improves 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."
