Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."


U.S. Gasoline Prices Fall Below $4 as U.S.-Iran Deal Eases Oil Market Concerns
Gold Holds Gains as Oil Prices Retreat and Fed Decision Looms
SpaceX Stock Soars After Historic IPO, Reaches $2.5 Trillion Market Value
Dollar Slips as U.S.-Iran Peace Deal Boosts Risk Appetite and Pressures Safe-Haven Demand
ASX Proposes New Share Dilution Limits for Public Takeovers
German Auto Suppliers Turn Bearish as Investment and Jobs Shift Overseas
SpaceX IPO Sparks Market Optimism as Shares Surge 19% on Trading Debut
AI-Focused Asia Hedge Funds Deliver Triple-Digit Returns in 2026 Rally
Asian Currencies Steady as Dollar Holds Firm Ahead of Fed Decision and US-Iran Deal Details
Myanmar Economic Outlook Hit by Fuel Price Shock as World Bank Cuts Growth Forecast
Oil Prices Ease as Markets Weigh U.S.-Iran Peace Deal and Strait of Hormuz Reopening
Trump Administration Closes Delta Air Lines Investigation Over 2024 CrowdStrike Outage
Lazard Challenges Centerview for Role in Venezuela’s Massive Debt Restructuring
GM and Lockheed Martin Partner to Strengthen U.S. Defense Manufacturing Capacity
SoftBank Shares Drop as OpenAI Losses and Rising Costs Spark Investor Concerns
BOJ Raises Interest Rates to 31-Year High, Signals Strong Focus on Inflation Risks
US Stock Futures Edge Higher Ahead of Key Federal Reserve Decision 



