Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."


Oil Prices Slip as U.S.-Iran Talks Continue Amid Ceasefire Tensions
Wall Street Futures Steady as AI Rally Offsets Middle East Tensions
Ferrari Luce: How Ferrari Evolved From Hybrid Supercars to Its First Fully Electric Vehicle
Puerto Rico Economic Development Chief Resigns Amid Government Shake-Up
Nikkei Hits Record High as AI Chip Stocks Power Japan Market Rally
EU Antitrust Probe Could Lead to Massive Google Fine Under DMA Rules
SQM Q1 Profit More Than Doubles as Lithium Prices Surge
European EV Sales Surge in April 2026 as Tesla and Chinese Automakers Gain Ground
Dollar Gains Slightly as U.S.-Iran Tensions Keep Forex Markets on Edge
U.S. Launches New Strikes on Iran as Trump Signals Peace Deal Uncertainty
Wall Street Climbs as Micron Leads Chip Stock Rally Amid Iran Peace Hopes
Morgan Stanley Names Top AI Security and Data Center Stocks for 2026
HP Q2 2026 Earnings Beat Expectations Despite Memory Chip Pressure
Australia Inflation Cools in April as Fuel Prices Ease, But Core CPI Remains Sticky
Synopsys Q2 FY2026 Earnings Beat Driven by AI and Semiconductor Demand
UK Grocery Inflation Slows to 3.1% as Supermarket Price Pressures Ease in May 2026
Huawei Chip Breakthrough Sparks Rally in Chinese Semiconductor Stocks 



