Menu

Search

  |   Business

Menu

  |   Business

Search

Lawsuit Challenges Alabama's Forced Prison Labor System That Benefits McDonald's, KFC, Burger King, Wendy's

Alabamans and labor organizations are taking a stand against the exploitation and discrimination embedded within the state's prison labor system.

Incarcerated Alabamans and labor organizations have filed a federal class action lawsuit against the state of Alabama, demanding an end to the controversial forced prison labor system. This system "leases" incarcerated individuals to major companies such as McDonald's, KFC, Burger King, and Wendy's.

The lawsuit alleges that Alabama generates $450 million annually through this practice, as per The Union Journal.

Allegations of Modern-Day Slavery

The lawsuit argues that the state's practice of prison labor amounts to "modern-day slavery." Truth Out reported that incarcerated individuals are compelled to work, often receiving minimal to no compensation, while their labor benefits government entities and private businesses.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, the suit represents a group of ten Black plaintiffs who assert that parole denials are systematically used to maintain a pool of workers, disproportionately affecting Black Alabamians compared to white candidates.

The lawsuit's primary objective is to secure compensation for incarcerated individuals who have been exploited within Alabama's forced prison labor system. The suit argues that this system is discriminatory and directly violates a 2015 state law requiring evidence-based parole decisions from the Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles.

The state's alleged denial of parole to Black Alabamians at a rate twice that of white candidates perpetuates this exploitative cycle.

Widespread Exploitation and Profits

Since 2018, over 575 businesses and more than 100 public agencies in Alabama have engaged incarcerated individuals for various tasks, including janitorial work, driving, metal fabrication, landscaping, and even fast-food service. The lawsuit claims that this exploitation allows these entities to reap annual benefits of $450 million, highlighting the issue's magnitude.

One of the ten plaintiffs, Alimireo English, was recently denied parole, further illustrating the hardships faced by incarcerated individuals. English, who remains on call 24-7, labors without receiving any payment for his work.

The lawsuit places significant responsibility on the Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles for perpetuating the exploitation of incarcerated workers in defiance of the 2015 state legislation that called for evidence-guided parole decisions. By failing to adhere to this law, the state enables the continuation of a system that bears disturbing resemblance to Alabama's historically notorious "convict leasing" practice.

Challenging an Unjust System

The lawsuit draws attention to the historical context, comparing Alabama's current prison labor system to the infamous "convict leasing" program that operated from 1875 to 1928. During this period, Black laborers were forced to work for private companies, generating substantial revenues for state and county governments, while the workers themselves received little compensation.

The lawsuit not only seeks to dismantle Alabama's forced prison labor system but also advocates for justice and reform. By exposing the inequities within the current system, the plaintiffs aim to spark significant changes that will protect the rights and dignity of incarcerated individuals.

Photo: Mufid Majnun/Unsplash

  • Market Data
Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.