Sable Offshore Wins Key Court Battle Over California Oil Pipeline 
Trump Questions USMCA Renewal as Trade Talks Continue 
Trump Administration Urges Judge to Allow UFC Event on White House Lawn 
Google Gemini Co-Lead Noam Shazeer Leaves for OpenAI Amid AI Talent Race 
Apple Signals Product Price Hikes Amid Rising Memory Chip Costs 
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Law Enforcement Mask Ban 
SoftBank Shares Drop as OpenAI Losses and Rising Costs Spark Investor Concerns 
Obayashi to Acquire Multiplex in $526M Expansion Deal 
German Auto Suppliers Turn Bearish as Investment and Jobs Shift Overseas 
Kennedy Center Ordered to Remove Trump Name Following Federal Court Ruling 
Canada Imposes 10% Tariff on Canned Vegetable Imports to Protect Domestic Industry 
Qantas Unveils Wellness-Focused Nonstop Sydney-London Flights to Reduce Jet Lag 
Japan Signals Readiness to Intervene as USD/JPY Nears 161 Amid Yen Weakness 
Trump Team Rejects BBC Financial Data Request in $10B Lawsuit 
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan Suspended as Member States Consider Removal 
Hyundai to Acquire SoftBank’s Remaining Boston Dynamics Stake for $325 Million 
Oil Prices Drop as U.S.-Iran Peace Deal Eases Supply Concerns 
New York marketing agency Uber Inc agreed to dismiss its trademark infringement claims in Manhattan federal court against rideshare company Uber Technologies and its advertising partner Adomni over plans to display ads on its drivers' cars.
Uber Inc sued Uber Technologies and Adomni last year as the latter group's plan would supposedly create consumer confusion with the marketing agency, which has worked with such brands as BMW and Macy's.
Uber Inc, which has been using the "Uber" name since 1999, said it has dealt with "constant business interruptions" from transactions meant for the rideshare company.
The interruptions include customer complaints, product shipments, legal correspondence, and other communications
Uber Inc. has also rejected Uber Technologies' offer of $120,000 in exchange for changing its name.
Meanwhile, Adomni provides ad services for Uber Technologies as "Uber OOH."
US District Judge Kevin Castel found that Uber Inc made plausible claims that Uber Technologies infringed and diluted its trademarks.
Consequently, Castel rejected Uber Technologies' motion to dismiss the complaint in February.
