Japan’s Service Sector Sustains Growth Momentum in November 
BOJ Governor Ueda Highlights Uncertainty Over Future Interest Rate Hikes 
Germany’s Economic Recovery Slows as Trade Tensions and Rising Costs Weigh on Growth 
Oil Prices Slip as Russia-Ukraine Peace Hopes Fade and Oversupply Fears Grow 
China Urged to Prioritize Economy Over Territorial Ambitions, Says Taiwan’s President Lai 
Citi Sets Bullish 2026 Target for STOXX 600 as Fiscal Support and Monetary Easing Boost Outlook 
Asian Markets Mixed as Fed Rate Cut Bets Grow and Japan’s Nikkei Leads Gains 
Gold Prices Steady as Markets Await Key U.S. Data and Expected Fed Rate Cut 
U.S. Futures Steady as Rate-Cut Bets Rise on Soft Labor Data 
RBA Signals Possible Rate Implications as Inflation Proves More Persistent 
Trump and Lula Discuss Trade, Sanctions, and Security in “Productive” Phone Call 
China’s Services Sector Posts Slowest Growth in Five Months as Demand Softens 
Australia’s Economic Growth Slows in Q3 Despite Strong Investment Activity 
Asian Markets Mixed as RBI Cuts Rates and BOJ Signals Possible Hike 
Dollar Slides to Five-Week Low as Asian Stocks Struggle and Markets Bet on Fed Rate Cut 
South Korea Posts Stronger-Than-Expected 1.3% Economic Growth in Q3 
Asian Currencies Steady as Markets Await Fed Rate Decision; Indian Rupee Hits New Record Low 
Tesla and JPMorgan have mutually agreed to settle their legal battle over warrants tied to Elon Musk’s notorious $420 tweet. The dismissal of claims brings an end to years of litigation and opens the door to renewed commercial relations.
Tesla and JPMorgan Announce End to Legal Battle
Bloomberg reports that in a one-page court statement on Friday, the parties announced their intention to terminate the case. In the document, the parties abandoned all claims against each other and waived the right to refile them. No settlement agreement was disclosed.
"JPMorgan and Tesla have decided to enter into a new commercial relationship and settle the outstanding disputes between the companies," a bank representative said in an emailed statement Saturday. “This is a good outcome for all and we look forward to working together.”
According to JPMorgan's 2021 lawsuit against Elon Musk's electric vehicle manufacturer, Tesla, the bank asserted that it was due the amount it wanted in shares based on an agreement from 2014. If the stock price went above a specific threshold, Tesla would have to pay JPMorgan either in shares or cash, according to that agreement.
Tesla's 2014 Agreement Linked to Share Payments
The lawsuit states that the deal was arranged so that the carmaker could avoid having its stock diluted through the issuance of convertible notes and take advantage of specific federal income tax advantages.
According to the bank's lawsuit, the agreement was hampered by an August 2018 tweet by Musk. Elon Musk, in his now-famous tweet, announced his consideration of taking Tesla private at $420 per share and claimed to have "funding secured."
JPMorgan claimed the ability to change the warrants' strike price depends on variables, including Tesla stock volatility. Following Musk's withdrawal from the situation and the tweet, it made the necessary adjustments.
Musk's "Funding Secured" Tweet Sparks Controversy
Claiming that JPMorgan had used the tweet to lower the striking price of over 1.9 million warrants, Tesla subsequently filed its own claims, Yahoo Finance shares. The court's decision was characterized as an attempt by the bank to gain an unfair advantage and a "cynical" violation of their agreement.
Requests for comment regarding Friday's filing dismissing the claims went unanswered by Tesla and its attorneys.
September Court Ruling Influenced Settlement
The filing is a direct result of the Manhattan federal judge's September finding that JPMorgan was found guilty. The bank had asked US District Judge Paul Gardephe to decide in its favor on its breach-of-contract allegations and against Tesla's claims before trial, but Gardephe declined.
