The U.S. Supreme Court declined to temporarily block a $655.5 million judgment against the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), allowing the damages award to remain in effect while the organizations pursue an appeal.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor rejected the emergency request on Monday without providing an explanation and did not refer the matter to the full Supreme Court. The ruling stems from a civil lawsuit filed on behalf of Americans who were killed or injured in a series of shootings and bombings in the Jerusalem area between 2002 and 2004.
The case was originally decided in favor of the plaintiffs in 2015, when a New York federal court awarded more than $655 million in damages. However, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the verdict in 2016, ruling that the federal court lacked jurisdiction. The Supreme Court declined to review that decision in 2018.
Congress later enacted the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019, expanding the ability of American victims to pursue claims against Palestinian authorities. The law treats the PA and PLO as consenting to U.S. jurisdiction if they engage in certain activities in the United States or make payments linked to attacks on Americans.
In June 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law, leading the 2nd Circuit to reinstate the original judgment in March. The Palestinian organizations are now appealing that decision while seeking to delay enforcement.
The PA and PLO argued that collecting the judgment would inflict severe financial damage, threaten essential public services in the West Bank, and undermine regional stability. They said the plaintiffs intend to seek payment from Palestinian tax revenues collected by Israel, a major source of government funding for security, education, and sanitation services.
The organizations also contended that the judgment had effectively become void after earlier appeals concluded in 2018. Despite those arguments, Sotomayor declined to pause enforcement, allowing the legal battle over the multimillion-dollar terrorism-related damages award to continue.


Trump Gaza Peace Plan Faces Setback as Israeli Strikes Continue, Hamas Disarmament Dispute Deepens
Trump Orders Warning Signs Outside Smithsonian Museum Over ‘Anti-American’ Exhibits
Eduardo Bolsonaro Granted U.S. Green Card Amid Brazil Legal Battle and Tariff Dispute
Ukraine Protests Grow Over Zelensky’s Dismissal of Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov
AI Avatar of Jair Bolsonaro Sparks Legal Battle Ahead of Brazil’s 2026 Presidential Election
Trump Administration Imposes New Forced Labor Tariffs on 60 Trading Partners
Israel Strikes Gaza as Trump Ceasefire Push Faces Fresh Challenges
Russian Border Drone Strike Kills Child in Belgorod, Injures Two Others
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts
Maduro, U.S. Prosecutors Propose June 2027 Trial Date in Drug Trafficking Case
Domino’s Weighs Appeal After Australian Court Rules Workers Were Misled on Pay
California ICE Detention Center Found to Have Inadequate Medical Care, Court Monitor Says
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits
Former House Appropriations Chair Kay Granger Dies at 83
US Embassies Urge Americans to Leave Middle East as Iran Tensions Escalate
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight
US Customs Inspects China-Linked Factories in Vietnam Amid Trade Compliance Review 



